Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Primary source analysis essay
Primary source analysis example
Primary source analysis example
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Primary source analysis essay
Revolutions are usually associated with change. Although change is monumental and significant, the way change happens and why it happens are more important things to consider. Looking at two specific revolutions in history, the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution, there are two major leaders who greatly stand out. In these two primary sources they share their goals, characterization of democracy, and opinions of violence in their movements that greatly influenced change. The French Revolution lasted from 1789 to 1799 and had a main goal of decreasing powerful monarchs and increasing democracies and nationalism. The Russian revolution in this primary source took place in 1917 and had a goal to get rid of Bourgeoisie power and ultimately create a communist Soviet Union. Maximilien Robespierre started as a young French local lawyer and politician who became a very influential figure in the French Revolution. Robespierre was influenced by the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a scholar from Switzerland that believed the determination of people was vital, and that the rightfulness of the king/monarch depended on what the people wanted or would agree with. Essentially, he thought that the government rested on the will of the people and spread ideas to men like Robespierre. Robespierre led one of the most radical periods of the French Revolution known as the Reign of Terror. He led the Jacobins from 1793 to 1794, who were a radical republican group that made up most of The National Convention. The National Convention was the new government in France at the time. The period that he led the Jacobins was also the period of the Reign of Terror, a deathly phase of the revolution when thousands of lives were lost to the guillotine. To... ... middle of paper ... ...olence that led to the change. Understanding why an action was taken leads to a better understanding to an outcome. Unfortunately neither of these two strong leaders had too much of a successful outcome. Robespierre was eventually executed and the Reign of Terror was ended. Lenin was however more successful than Robespierre, he took over Russia renaming it the Soviet Union like he had planned, but eventually became to ill to rule leaving the country in poor conditions to Stalin. All together it is shown that violence and democracy do go hand in hand in a revolution according to these two prominent leaders. They saw violence as the most successful way to create the change they aimed for in their countries. Works Cited Bulliet, Richard W. "Chapter 22." The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History: Vol.II: Since 1500. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, 2011. N. pag. Print
By understanding these, one can come up with a working definition of revolution and the similarities between the two conflicts, which span over 150 years between the two. To understand both conflicts, one must first understand that revolution is not a single event. It is instead a process. The goal of revolution is the redistribution of wealth and economic power. In both cases the battles waged in both wars were waged for these reasons and in both cases the seeds for these revolutions had been planted long before the conflicts themselves.
Maximilien Robespierre declared at the trial of King Louis XVI. “The King must die so that the nation can live.” Robespierre advocated the kings demise and with it the ways of the Ancien Régime. However, in an ironic twist of fate his words also foreshadowed his own rise and fall as the leader of the French Revolution. Known as “The Incorruptible”, or alternately “Dictateur Sanguinaire” Robespierre is a monumental figure of the French Revolution, but which was he? Was he the incorruptible revolutionist fighting to overthrow the Ancien Regime or a raging radical that implemented his own absolute tendencies under the cover of the revolution? When dissecting the dichotomy of Robespierre’s life and actions during the French Revolution and comparing it to the seven main characteristics of Absolutism it can be seen that Robespierre held many absolutist tendencies.
98 ) Much of the revolution is owed to the drought that happened in France, causing famines, which motivated many to speak out against the injustices and flaws that came with monarchies. One individual who sought equal treatment for all was Maximilien Robespierre.
In his book, The Anatomy of Revolution, Crane Brinton describes four historically significant revolutions in modern states, the English Revolution of the 1640s, the American Revolution of 1776, the French Revolution of 1789, and the Russian Revolution of 1917, and compares uniform trends and commonalities within those revolutions. Brinton hypothesizes that those revolutions have specific similarities in their inception, manifestation, conduct, and conclusion.
In 1905 , Russia had a prerevolution that was put down of the Czar. Instead of learning from this prerevolution, Czar Nicholas II, made a very big mistake by in not introducing some reforms to correct the problems. So because of his actions, the situation grew worse. In 1917, the Russians were fighting in World War I. A good majority of the Russian people were weary and uncontent with the way the war was going and with the Czar's rule. This uncontent along with economic hardships caused riots and demonstrations to break out. The Czar called for the army to put down the revolution as they did in 1905. But the army joined the revolt and the Czar was kicked out of power soon afterwards. A temporary government was set up to decide on what kind of government Russia was gonna set up. Two political parties were set up. The Bolsheviks were one of the two. The leader of the Bolshevik party was a man named Lenin. Lenin was a firm believer of the theories and ideas of Karl Marx. So with his slogan of "Bread, Peace and Land", Lenin gained the support of the peasants and gained control of Russia and setup a communist state.
The American Revolution and French Revolution were two long lasting uprisings that had great value to those battling for their rights and want they wanted to change. Yet there are a few distinctions details set them apart in a small way. The Americans wanted a change in their government, but the French wanted a huge change in everything including their government, religion, social structure (whereas American’s social system stayed the same) and economy. Other than the few differences they had, they two Revolutions were much alike, basically twin revolutions.
Maximilien Robespierre was a States-General during the French Revolution, and was one of the leaders the Jacobins and the Reign of Terror. He was born on May 6, 1758 in Arras, France. He was the oldest out of four children, and when he was six years old, his mother died (5). Robespierre’s father left him and his siblings soon after his wife’s death and they were left to live with their aunts and grandfather. Eventually, he studied law at the University of Paris, and was chosen to give a speech to Louis XVI at his coronation (1). He was best known for defending the poor, and giving long and tedious speeches at the local academies (2).
The French Revolution was one of the larger social revolutions. It can be considered a revolution on the political, social, religious, and economic front, although the biggest causes were social. The French Revolution began on July 14, 1789, with the fall of Bastille and continued until the rise of power of Napoleon Bonaparte. The main re...
Although, the Reign of Terror was seen as a way to let the revolution live and was well supported it was not justified. Because the internal threats propagated radicalism, the external threats raged and became stronger, and the methods became chaotic the Reign of Terror extended its stay in France until the death of the powerful leader Robespierre. The Reign of Terror was an outreach to gain rights but during this period they were taken away until the fateful day of Robespierre’s death ending the Terror.
The Reign of Terror is an extremely controversial time period during the French Revolution because it shows France turning on its people with opposing political views that threatened the Revolution’s progression. At this time, the rebels were considered violent threats and the ways to deal with them became increasing violent and dictatorial. In 1792, the National Convention created fundamental changes in France’s government, drastically changing the political and social landscape. According to Popkin, “Some believe the assembly laid the groundwork for the basic institutions that make France a democratic society today, while others see the Convention as a violent and destructive regime comparable to the totalitarian dictatorships of the twentieth century (Popkin, 63).” Even though historians disagree, they cannot disagree on the radical policies that are no doubt some of the most radical moments in French Revolution history. They’re related specifically to their creation of democracy and the polices of terror, which also rose the questioned of whether the government was a democracy or a dictatorship because of the lack of political freedom and complete control over the people of France.
King Louis XVI of France once said, ”I have no intention of sharing my authority.” This was the reason that the Robespierre party decided to revolt against the corrupt and absolute French monarchy. Though not fulfilled directly after the French Revolution, the goals of Robespierre would be achieved with greatness in time. Napoleon became emperor after the revolution, but this was because the country was in ruins and needed to be brought back into stability before making an unstable constitutional monarchy. This revolution achieved Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity through the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. The French Revolution also led to French
Maximilian Robespierre, a new picture of France was trying to be achieved. However, that picture could only be achieved after the people were re-educated and the Old Regime was out of sight. Until those goals were accomplished, Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety would rule over France. However with change comes revolution and therefore people took charge. To wipe out the Old Regime, Robespierre sentenced twenty thousand people to the guillotine. The guillotine was put up to kill innocent people. With the organization of planning his vision, he sent a movement over France which became known as the Reign of Terror.
The Russian Revolutions of 1917 led to the riddance of the czarist Russia as well as the ushering in of the socialistic Russia. The first of the two revolutions forced Nicolas II to abdicate his throne to a provisional government. Lenin headed the second of the two revolutions in which he overthrew the provisional government.
Throughout history, countless uprisings have occurred. Historians classify any forcible overthrow of a government or social order in favor of a new system as a revolution. The success or failure of a revolution is directly related to the revolution’s causes and courses. The French Revolution was more successful than the Nicaraguan Revolution, because the Nicaraguan Revolution left the country in social and financial ruin, foreign powers had much greater interference, and it precipitated a period of political unrest with multiple leadership changes.
Russian Revolution Essay. Throughout history, there have been many revolutions between the population of a country and its government. People always wanted change, usually in the directions of freedom, peace and equality and in the lead up to the 1917 Russian revolution; there were a variety of social, political and economic situations that all played their part. In the years leading up to the revolution, Russia had been involved in a series of wars. The Crimean war, the Russo-Turkish war, the Russo-Japanese war and the First World War.