The First Athenian Tribute Quota-List Analysis

628 Words2 Pages

The First Athenian Tribute Quota-List, 454/3, IG I3 259 was the first of the 15-20 total upright marble slabs, known as stalae in Athens. The erection of these tablets started in the year 454/3 BCE on the Acropolis of Athens. Recorded on each of these were offerings, in tribute to the gods and goddesses, known as the aparchai or first-fruit, collected by the Hellenotamiai. The tablet, started in 454/3 BCE, covered the first fifteen years of tribute, the second covered the next eight, and the remaining covered each following year individually. The passage from The First Athenian Tribute Quota-List, 454/3, IG I3 259 is likely from the beginning of the of the very first tablet as the years line up. Each of the tablets begin with the name of the …show more content…

As stated previously, the secretary is unknown, thus who engraved the tablet is uncertain. Nonetheless, as the list went through several steps before being engraved and was, for all intents and purposes, a legal document, it is highly unlikely to contain any bias. As well, it is improbable that it was falsified at any stage as there was nothing to gain from this and in the context of the tablet, bribery would have been senseless. Although it is doubtful, if the function of the tablet was truly to show the power of Athens, then the numbers could have potentially been increased. Nevertheless, it can be argued that the tablet is not in fact dependable, as it is very limited in the sense of restoration. The First Athenian Tribute Quota-List, 454/3, IG I3 259, was discovered in extremely damaged pieces. Due to different forms of ruin, much of the writing was worn beyond legibility. However, deep features not visible to the naked eye that were caused by the act of engraving have been detected with the use of technology. Moreover, segments that had an apparent connection were placed together. Then a more intact version of the tablet was made in order to get a better sense of what the full tablet looked like. Even so, numerous gaps were still left for modern scholars to fill in. In the first section of the passage from The First Athenian Tribute Quota-List, 454/3, IG I3 259, only

Open Document