The Fallacy Of False Cause Summary

687 Words2 Pages

Through the utilization of the multiple Fallacies of Reasoning, one can determine that the unpasteurized milk - of which came from Diana Reed’s farm - ultimately caused the outbreak of Campylobacter amongst the 40 Durand High School football players. This conclusion can be determined through the specific application of the Fallacy of False Cause. The Fallacy of False Cause describes a situation in which the speaker relies on insufficient evidence to identify the causes and effects within a certain situation. Although commonly associated with superstitions, or the idea of “bad luck,” this fallacy can also be used in situations where the speaker lacks knowledge on the direct cause-and-effect relationship between two events. Specifically within …show more content…

This statement could initially be considered logical, as it was reported within the article that undercooked chicken could possibly carry pathogens, of which have the capability to result in Campylobacter outbreaks. However, it could also be argued that Diana Reed is simply using this claim to defend herself, of which showcases a possible bias amongst the farmer. Furthermore, the idea that Diana’s conclusion isn’t factual comes from the idea that her argument was heavily based upon inductive reasoning, of which identifies specific claims - otherwise known as premises - to provide evidence for a considerably general conclusion. Inductive reasoning is often times considered to be flawed, as it commonly reaches general conclusions that are not always based on entirely factual premises. However, in addition to Diana’s claims losing credibility, my argument also loses some credibility, as I too have to base my conclusions on inductive …show more content…

These statements lead to the conclusion that the chicken ultimately caused the outbreak of disease, yet I personally still don’t believe this claim is entirely true. The majority of evidence I rely on to negate Diana’s claims comes from the testing of manure at the Reed farm for pathogens relating to the Campylobacter disease. Ultimately, these tests came back positive, of which means that there was a distinct set of pathogens found in the manure that have genetic links to the Campylobacter disease. Since this test - and furthermore the results - come from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services’ Laboratory, I feel that Diana’s conclusion isn’t as truthful as she claims. This is because I feel that the Wisconsin Department of Health Services is a more valid and reliable source, as they most likely do not have a bias in the situation, and furthermore would not tamper with any evidence. This contrasts from the claims that come from Diana, as she uses personal experiences to emphasize the safety of her unpasteurized milk. Although neither my statement nor hers can be entirely considered truthful, I

Open Document