Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of technology on society
Effects of technology on society
Effects of technology on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of technology on society
As a Communication student, I strongly believe that communication plays a vital role in our society, therefore we should not only be aware of what communication is merely all about but we should also be aware about its impact in our society. Learning about the four periods of rhetorical studies enlightened me that there are enormous requirements in order to fully comprehend what communication is truly all about. “The Development of the Field of Communication: Our Roots” in some way gives me an idea about the effects of communication studies that has started a long time ago up to the major trends that we have in the present day.
In Greek tradition, the Classical period arose with Greek democracy. It was mentioned in the readings that during this period people found out that they had to speak for themselves to exercise their rights. According to Gerard Hauser’s Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres “democracy is based on premise that public opinion should matter in deciding the course of society.” The main idea of this period is that public communication is significant in solving problems. We consider public communication as the core of economy, society and politics. No policies or products will be successful without a keen communication directed to the right audience in creative ways. In early times up to the presents, speakers use this communication strategy – public communication – to influence the minds of the people to think wisely.
While the rhetoric was weakening its role in political aspect, it started playing a prominent role in the rise of Christianity with the rise of the medieval period. The rise and fall of rhetoric happened during this period. During its early years, Christians agreed upon gett...
... middle of paper ...
...to new things, it is also more accessible and fast, it provides latest information, it can be a form of entertainment and it can also be used to educate people.
After learning about the history of rhetoric, I came to realize that not all innovations are good. Yes, we do benefit from these innovations but they also have negative effects to people such as; it fails to recall the importance of face-to-face communication, sensational news are often used to get attention from the public which may be misleading and divert the minds of youth in the wrong path and media bias can occur in due to various reasons. Despite all the changes we should still not forget about the true essence of communication. It’s not just a simple process of exchanging messages to socialize with other people but it plays a pivotal role in building economic and social advancements in our society.
...o engage in destructive rhetoric are held to task, rhetoric cannot simply be attributed to some state of affairs, while the rhetorician from whose lips the rhetoric emerges is held to no ethical standard. Certainly it is conceivable that rhetoric can have destructive consequences. Rhetoric seems to have played a central role in the deterioration of people’s faith in their systems of government, or the electoral process by which they choose their representatives. A view of rhetoric in which the rhetorician is accountable for the effects of the change they inflict upon the world could lead to less destructive rhetoric and a society which operates on the solid ground of personal responsibility.
Former president Bush speech "Address to Joint Session of Congress Following 9/11 Attacks" and Malala Yousafzai's speech “Youth Takeover of the United Nation" both shows exemplary examples of how those in power can use rhetoric to affect society. Bush’s speech is right after the 9-11 attack so Bush uses rhetoric in a negative way because his focus is on war, Malala uses it in a positive way because she has just recovered from a getting shot for fighting for women’s education. So her focus is bringing people together and help focus on children and womens rights. The rhetoric appeals that they used frequently throughout their speech are diction, pathos, ethos, and logical fallacies. Rhetoric is a form of writing that authors, speakers use and
The question of what is rhetoric and what does it do has been a question since stories were even being recorded. However, now there are multiply different scholars who believe that they understand what rhetoric is and how to use it. For someone to use rhetoric correctly they must first have a definition of rhetoric that either they have made to fit themselves or they find a previous definition that suits them. In order for me to become an improved rhetor and be able to rhetorical discuss and evaluate pieces of literature or speeches like General Douglas MacArthur’s Farewell address, I must first define rhetoric in how I understand it. Rhetoric is the art of persuasive speaking aimed to sway your audience in a direction that has been chosen by the rhetor. The way in which a citizen uses rhetoric can change over time. The need to argue the same problem is invalid so the need to use the same rhetorical situations is invalid. You can use rhetoric in a multitude of different areas within our life however; we must choose to use it for good or for evil. In order for rhetoric to still be used in speech today one of two things must be true. There must either be a Truth in life and rhetoric or the more likely choice, that rhetoric changes throughout time and situations. You are not trying to change someone’s mind about something however; you are trying to convince them that you are also correct. I will be using multiple pieces of works that are defining rhetoric to support my definition and finish by evaluating General Douglas MacArthur’s Farewell Address using my definition of rhetoric.
Rhetoric is the ability to persuade someone through the art of speaking or writing. In their essays, “Should Everyone Go to College?” by Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill as well as “Colleges Prepare People for Life” by Freeman Hrabowski, the authors are trying to provide information about the benefits and disadvantages of attending college using rhetoric to fortify their responses. However, Hrabowski uses rhetoric more effectively than Owen and Sawhill which strengthens his arguments causing his audience to desire a college education.
In that light, it is interesting to analyse what it is that made these artistic words such a difference. A difference that persuaded people to change their behavior. Thankfully, human history has created a term to define these great speeches. It is called rhetoric. In this essay we will try to determine whether rhetoric is an art, or merely a
The desire of rhetoric is always seated in attaining and preserving happiness. Corax of Syracuse (and/or Tisias) is regarded as the first theorist to devise an art of rhetoric as a means to help citizens regain their property seized under the rule of a despot. In this foremost case of Greco-Roman rhetoric, political happiness was sought by means of judicial speeches. The poly-discursive varieties of rhetorical happiness have theoretically expanded in depth and scope from the philosophical, metaphysical, ethical, religious, psychological, and aesthetic. If citizens in the 5th century BCE were happy, then there would have been no need for rhetoric; as a result, the foundational assumption of my special area exam is that happiness remains an ideological desire advancing rhetoric.
In the story, What is Rhetoric by William Covino and David Jolliffe, there are a wide variety of topics discussed that are inextricably interwoven with the concept “rhetoric.” Rhetoric, as defined by the authors, is “the study and practice of shaping content.” Consequently, my first thought was: Ok, this is a rather broad and opaque description; my successive thought, however, was one of astonishment, inasmuch as the authors went on to further elucidated this jargon. In doing so, the authors distilled the most crucial elements of what is rhetoric— the prevalence of discourse community, and how appealing language is often a precursor to persuasion.
Through concepts and principles which we studied in the “dialogic communication studies”, “Dialogue” is a special form of communication that creates positive results for individuals, group, organization and communities. This concept has become a central of various theoretical perspectives in humanity and social sciences studies by looking at social relation and interaction as dialogue.
Saxonhouse, Arlene. Free Speech and Democracy in Ancient Athens. 1st ed. Cambrige, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Rhetoric in the article by William Covino and David Jolliffe is explained as an art of persuasion that uses communication with a purpose or goal. To add, it is an ongoing conversation between the rhetor and the auditors. In addition to using persuasion, the observance of the audience is used as well. In the article by William Covino and David Jolliffe they talk about the four major elements of rhetoric: the rhetorical situation, the audience, the methods of persuasion, and the 5 canons. As explained in the reading the purpose of rhetorical communication is to teach, to please, and to move.
Philosophers as well as ordinary people have different ideals and morals. They sometimes agree on things, but most of the time they contradict each other on certain ideas or principles. Both Pericles and Aristophanes were wise men that analyzed certain aspects of life that are essential for a thriving society. Although Pericles has a point on democracy being the essential way to rule Athens, through seeing Aristophanes’ evidence I argue that unjust speech can corrupt the society because it makes people engage in selfish behavior and make bad decisions that affect everyone.
Clark (2016) suggests that rhetoric isn’t limited to oral communication, but currently has a permanent foothold in written works: magazine or newspaper excerpts, novels, and scientific reports. Not only written
Advancement from Enlightenment As the 1900's rolled around, many changes were to come. New leaders, government styles, and new ideas were just the start. The main focus of the Enlightenment era was based on reason, rationalism, and the idea of "Inevitable Progress. " Enlightenment was pushed forward by great people such as Kant, Bulgaria, Thomas Jefferson, Isaac Newton, Francois-Marie Ardouet de Voltaire, Thomas Hobbes, to name a few.
Now the communication class is almost over I have realize how important is to have good communication skills, and how it is key to life. I have learned many things in this class for example ways to approach strangers. Another thing that I have learned how to handle conflict and how sometimes it could be good it not always bad and many others. The way I look things have change to have reach my goals. This class was has also taught me how to look in the “other” perceptive, and not being selfish by just seeing one side. All that I have learn will help me and other around me to be able to communicate better.
It advances education substantially, saves many lives, allows communication throughout the world instantly, organizes so much information that is easily accessible, and helps with innovation and creativity in humans. Sure there are negatives to it, but what really matters is how much the positives and negatives weigh out. It has advanced the human race so far above any other race on Earth that we have trouble keeping up with it. The beauty behind it is that it can never stop advancing. There will always be that more that can be upgraded or invented, and it’s only getting better. What will be next? Flying cars powered by wind power? Just wait to see where we will be by the year