The Economist Essay: The Causes Of Poverty

1354 Words3 Pages

Thousands of individuals living in poverty. Why is it that this worldwide dilemma is still rising in rapid numbers to this day? Is it the fault of a lack of authority power, or a lack of one’s self control to do good? Despite the unknown cause, it has managed to drastically affect the lives of many. Poverty is like a curse, one that is wrongfully placed, difficult to get out of, and resistant to many forms of help. The pinpoint cause of poverty is challenging to find. People who live well off and are above the poverty line are quick to assume that laziness, addiction, and the typical stereotypes are the causes of poverty. Barbara Ehrenreich, a well known writer on social issues, brings attention to the stereotypical ideology at the time, that
The Economist, a weekly news magazine states, “poverty was socially useful … it was miserable for the poor” (20). Endorsing this claim, they did very little to go out of their way and improve the lives of those who were suffering and in poverty. For example, the development and widespread growth of poorhouses. As John Iceland write, “The poorhouses were harsh; their purpose was to deter all but the most desperate from applying for help. Poorhouse inmates were expected to work as a form of punishment, moral training, education, and reform” (6). The essence of Iceland’s argument is that, although many citizens found this new way of dealing with the poor to be very useful, it actually did very little to contribute to the reduction of individuals trapped in poverty. Instead, it required inmates to acknowledge that their unacceptable habits and character defects were believed to be the cause of their sufferment in poverty. The poorhouses poorly served their purpose.With further intentions of reducing poverty, Congress enacted the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity and Reconciliation Act (PRWORA). The act had intentions of limiting the amount of people receiving Government assistance by encouraging the idea of “work first.” Vivyan Adair, the director of the ACCESS project at Hamilton College states, “The act also promoted
A line that has set them apart from what they saw as the minority group. The use of inaccurate stereotypes has influence citizens to refrain from interacting with the unprivileged, it was as if the privileged believed poverty was contagious and feared it would pass onto them. In some cases the wealthy avoided interaction at an extreme level. Iceland states, “some middle-class and wealthy city residents began to build new homes in areas just outside cities such as New York and Boston in order to avoid the poor who lived in the cities themselves” (6). Acknowledging Iceland’s claim, it is not to say the wealthy completely disregarded the presence of the poor. New regulations were set in place for what they believed would “help” individuals out of poverty. The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) being one of them, coexisting with poor houses regulations, and the PRWORA. The TANF would make cash assistance available to individuals who participated only in government-imposed workfare. However, recipients of all government imposed regulations were repeatedly instructed on how to improve their attitudes, for it was assumed that the cause of their poverty was their poor life choices. The help that was provided placed the fault of their poverty directly at their feet. Despite the three

More about The Economist Essay: The Causes Of Poverty

Open Document