The Discussion Of Non-Resistance In Martin Luther King Jr.

1758 Words4 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. is considered to be one of the most prominent human rights’ defenders of the XX century and the speaker for non-violent social change. He believed that building power is the most important task facing movements for human progress because the human progress comes through the tireless efforts of people, who should use powerful and true weapon – non-violence – in order to achieve positive effects. King managed to achieve brilliant success in the battle for the liberty of blacks and not pour the way to freedom by rivers of blood. The leading item that is noticeable, when scientists try to provide with a broad description of the King’s activities is, of course, his role in the formation of unpretentious racial impartiality in the United States. The practice of establishment lasted for a …show more content…

King has identified six main points of his doctrine. The first item King argued that passive resistance is not cowardice, but the group of strong people. Another highlight for the characterization of non-violence is that using it does not pursue to overthrow or shame the rival, but try to win his companionship and consideration. The next feature of the idea of nonviolence is that it is directed against evil, namely racial discrimination, not against the people standing on its defense. The fourth point here is the desire to make the supporters of King suffering without retaliation. Fifth paragraph defining the non-violent resistance is that it can help to avoid not only outside physical violence, as well as inside violence of spirit. That is, an adherent of non-violent resistance has neither right to cause physical pain to the enemy, nor to hate him. The principle of love is the center for non-violence. Six main characteristic of non-violent resistance is an understanding that justice is on the side of the world. Therefore, those who believe in nonviolence deeply believe in the future (King,

Open Document