Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
roman empire economy republic fall.
economic failure in fall of roman empire
economic failure in fall of roman empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: roman empire economy republic fall.
West Stow is an area in Britain located within modern day Suffolk, which through the mid 5th century to early 7th century CE, housed a small Anglo-Saxon village. The setting for the formation of West Stow, and for Anglo-Saxon Britain in general, begins around 407 CE with the exit of Roman troops from Britain. In this paper, I will provide an overview of the circumstances that led to the Angles and the Saxons invading/migrating to Britain, what they built in West Stow, and whether/how we know what we do about this time period from archaeological findings, or from primary text sources.
To begin, as stated in the introduction, the Roman empire pulled it’s armies stationed in Britain to Gaul and possibly other locations within the empire to defend against the various barbarian invasions occurring in 407 CE. It’s unknown exactly why, but this seems to have lead to an extremely rapid governmental and economic collapse of Roman cities in Britain. After ~407 there is no evidence of new coins being minted, and no evidence of roads, walls, and buildings in the cities being repaired. During this time a few of the Germanic tribes, the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes, began a migration to Britain, possibly due to displacement caused by the migrations and conquests of other tribes.
There are a variety of theories about how the Anglo-Saxons integrated themselves into Britain, but actual evidence about this time period is rather lacking. We know when the Roman government collapsed from the latest dates on coins that have been found buried and lost, and by examining the dirt that has collected on top of the old Roman roads. However despite this evidence it’s unknown whether the Anglo-Saxons conquered Britain, or were to some extent welcomed in as...
... middle of paper ...
...eature of West Stow would be the Sunken Huts, named in a fairly self explanatory way. It’s unclear whether there was any one purpose for them, but there is evidence of them being used both as residential buildings, and sometimes, as being used for some specific task such as weaving (evidenced by loom weights being uncovered in the pit of a former sunken hut).
The other aspect to research on West Stow, is experimental archaeology, where researchers study the post holes, and then, based on the sizes and shapes of posts, attempt to rebuild what the buildings could have looked like, it is mainly through these methods that likely designs of Halls and Sunken huts are determined.
In short, what we know about West Stow and other areas in the Southern Kingdoms of the era, comes from a combination of a few primary text sources, and experimental/regular archaeology.
Kapelle, W.E. ‘The Norman conquest of the North:The region and its transformation 1000-1135’ (Croom Helm 1979)
- - - The New Penguin Atlas of Medieval History. London, England, Penguin Books, no publication
C. Warren Hollister, Anglo-Saxon Military Institutions: On the Eve of the Norman Conquest (Oxford: 1962), p. 26.
When the Romans Invaded Briton each Celtic tribe was treated differently. The Celtic Iceni tribe kept out of the violent conflict, and because of this they were awarded ‘client kingdom’ status by the Romans. Being a client kingdom meant that the Iceni tribe maintained a considerable amount of independence. They were allowed to keep their rulers, and they were allowed to mint coin. They were bound by treaty to Rome, who in return would back them up, often against rival tribes. Yet the Romans took the view that they had the authority, to at any time intervene in the internal affairs of their client kingdoms. On the other hand the main city of the Trinovantes tribe, which was located just south of the Iceni tribe, was declared by Emperor Claudius as the capital of his British province. The Trinovantes people lost their freedom as well as having most of the...
While the Anglo Saxons are the soldiers on foot holding axes and creating a shielded wall to brace impact. Using textual evidence and comparing it to the tapestry a medievalist can not only distinguish the two sides, but also learn what people in medieval times believed to be a beneficial way to explain significant events in their
Braddick, M. J., State formation in early modern England, c. 1550-1700, (New York : Cambridge University Press, 2000), 399.
Twenty years after the invasion, Britain was feeling oppressed by the Roman Empire, none more so than the Iceni tribe. Their late king, Prasutagus, had left the Icenian land to the Romans in his will, but on certain conditions. Upon his death, the Romans took over without abiding by any of these conditions, treating the land as if it was theirs by right of conquest. There was looting and tyranny, the king’s family was abused and the Romans savagely ruled over the Iceni. Another factor in aggravating the Britons was that the occupiers began to recall large loans which had been forced upon unwilling Britons. Some Britons were conscripted into the army, the Roman procurators wanted to extract as much wealth as could be had from the latest addition to the empire.
Kanner, Barbara, ed. The Women of England: From Anglo Saxon Times to the Present. Hamden: The Shoe String Press, 1979.
Gull, John. The Oxford Illustrated History of Brittan. Great Brittan: Butler & Tanner Ltd, Frome, Somerset., 1984. Print.
Nelson, Lynn. “The Collapse of the Carolingian Empire” Lectures University of Kansas. November 18, 1999. http://www.ukans.edu/kansas/medieval/108/lectures/carolingian%5Fempire%5Ffall.html
Bucholz, Robert, and Newton Key. Early Modern England 1485-1714 a Narrative History. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009.
Saxons from Germany began to assault and plunder the coasts of Britain, The Saxon’s raids start small and were easily defeated, but in 286 AD one group seized power over Britain for a decade until Emperor Constantius invaded and retook Britain. Back under Roman control, the people of Britain lived peacefully and began to prosper again. A few decades past and the Western Roman Empire went into economic and political decline. In 367 AD the Scots joined with the Saxons and began to raid Britain, but the Romans were able to keep order. The raids were contained until Roman soldiers began to be withdrawn in 383 AD and the raiding grew worse. The last of the Roman troops left in 407 and the Romano-Celts were left to defend themselves. “Roman Britain split into separate kingdoms but the Romano-Celts continued to fight the Saxon raiders.Roman civilization slowly broke down. In the towns people stopped using coins and returned to barter. The populations of towns were already falling and this continued. Rich people left to be self-sufficient on their estates. Craftsmen went to live in the countryside. More and more space within the walls of towns was giving over to growing crops. Roman towns continued to be inhabited until the mid-5th century. Then most were abandoned. Some may not have been deserted completely. A small number may have
Fell, Christine. Women in Anglo-Saxon England and the Impact of 1066. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.
Hollister, C. Warren. The Making of England. 7th ed. A History of England. Ed. Lacey Baldwin Smith. Vol. 1. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 1996.
Stratum 1 lacks a lot of information. There are no signs of permanent settlement, but there is a burial mound which suggests that the area held some kind of importance. Analysis shows that they consumed plants such as wheat, however, there is no evidence at the site that they practiced agriculture. The faunal remains of eagles and mountain lions suggests that they hunted quite a distance from the plains settlement. Their projectile points had evolved, but there was no evidence that they made them or where they would have been made. Even their knives were made of material foreign to the area. The bronze axe heads imply that they had developed casting methods, although there is no evidence of that either. It is more likely that the people who lived here moved from somewhere else and probably did not stay very long. The bodies in the burial mound being arranged around two of them suggests that those two had a higher social status which is compounded by the fact that the artifacts were associated with them. However, there is no evidence to tell exactly what their status was or how they ended up buried