The Daniel Pelka Serious Case Review

1723 Words7 Pages
The Daniel Pelka serious case review is one of many that are conducted around the United Kingdom every year. A serious case review is a local enquiry into the death or serious injury of a child, where abuse or neglect are known or suspected. These are conducted by the Local Safeguarding Children Boards; with the main focus being on what lessons can be learnt locally to prevent this from happening again (Brandon, Bailey, Belderson, 2010). In this textual analysis we will be looking back at previous case reviews including Jasmine Beckford and Baby P. We will then look at what recommendations have been made and use the Peka case to see weather we have learned from our previous mistakes or are we still in the same position now as we where then.

Jasmine Beckford’s case is the oldest out of the three; in 1984 Jasmine died as a result of long-term abuse aged 4. In 1981 her and her younger sister suffered serious injuries and were paced with foster carers for six months. After this they were allowed back home with their mother on a trial basis as social services were meant to support them. During the last ten months of Jasmine’s life she was only seen once by social workers (Corby, 2006).
During the court case the judge said that lead social worker Gunn Wahlstrom was “naïve beyond belief”. This report brought over 68 recommendations to make sure cases like this did not happen again. The recommendations included putting the child first and the parent’s second. “Jasmines’ fate illustrates all too clearly the disastrous consequences of the misguides attitude of the social workers having treated Morris Beckford and Beverley Lorrington as the clients first and foremost” (London Borough of Brent, 1985,p295). The social workers in Jasmine’s c...

... middle of paper ...

... Risk: The Challenges of Child Protection. Department of Sociological Studies: University of Sheffield.

Hendrick, H. (2005) Child welfare and social policy: an essential reader. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Holt, A. (2013). Starved boy Daniel Pelka 'invisible' to professionals. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-24106823. Last accessed 1st Nov 2013.

Local safeguarding children’s board Haringly. Serious Case Review: Baby Peter. Haringly Social Services: Haringly.
London Borough of Brent (1985) A Child in Trust: the report of the panel of inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death of Jasmine Beckford, London, Brent.
Parton, N., Thorpe, D. and Wattam, C. (1997) Child Protection Risk and Moral Order, London: Macmillan
Sidebotham, P. (2012). What do serious case reviews achieve?. British Medical Journal . 97 (3), 189-192.

More about The Daniel Pelka Serious Case Review

Open Document