The Crucible Play Vs Movie Essay

633 Words2 Pages

When I watch a good movie I feel pulled into a different universe it’s almost like your actually there.In the movie The Crucible its very good at pulling you in and putting you in the shoes of the people who had to go through the witch trials. This is in part to actor Daniel Lewis who plays John Proctor in the film, it’s almost like you know him it really shows you who he is and where he came from. Looking in the other direction the play shows a more human approach to The Crucible in some peoples opinions.The Crucible is best performed in the form of a movie because of the realistic settings and great performance by the actors. I think that the movie The Crucible did the best at portraying the characters. In the movie you can really see all the pain and stupidity of the events that took place in Salem in 1692. The characters in the movie The crucible i think were chosen wisely as they look the appropriate age and just look the part. In the the play I do not think it showed it nearly as good as the actors were older in the play than the movie. In the movie the props and outfits displayed by the characters were much more realistic and accurate to the time period. The movie really lets you get into the characters roles and see them as the colonists they play in the play …show more content…

The emotion that John proctor shows in the movie is very realistic and convincing. When you watch his parts in the movie the way he talks is just like I would imagine a person living in 1692 to talk like. In the movie when your watching his parts the camera angle is very good at portraying his story well and showing his emotions without him having to speak. In the play your sitting ten foot away from the actors if that and you cant see the emotion as well. The way he acts in the final scenes of the film really showed me what it would’ve felt like to be in that

Open Document