The Conjoined Twins Jodie and Mary

675 Words2 Pages

The Conjoined Twins Jodie and Mary

The moral and legal case of the conjoined twins Mary and Jodie has set

the nation off in a frenzy of debating on whether or not the twins

should be separated. In doing so, it has been revealed that only Jodie

has a chance of surviving the operation, meaning the operation is

virtually an act of murder in order to save Jodie's life. It has also

been made known that if both twins are left to let fate take its

course, they will be dead within six months. The almost impossible

moral decision of whether or not Mary's life should be sacrificed in

order to save Jodie's lies in the hands of the three Lords Justices of

Appeal. The question remains; should judges be given the permission to

'act God' as some people call it, and take away one life in order to

save another? Or should the twins be left to die which as some argue,

is what fate or indeed God has already decided should happen?

To take away one life in order to save another does hypothetically

make sense, but in reality can it ever be right for a doctor to

intentionally kill someone, even if it is to benefit another? Others

would argue that Mary would die anyway, so why not shorten her life by

six months if it saves another. Euthanasia in this country is illegal,

so should it be appropriate or (more importantly) legal for judges to

practically order the death of an innocent human being, even if

keeping the twins alive will result in the certain death of both

twins. This case is strikingly similar to one of someone wishing to

perform voluntary euthanasia, so why should this operation of

practical murder be allowed to take place? The only difference be...

... middle of paper ...

...does mean ending Mary's life six moths early. But

more important than my view is the parents view, and I find it

ridiculous that they are unable to decide what happens to their

children, and that these court officials somehow feel like they have

the right to determine the fate of someone else's children. Well I and

many others rightfully disagree. Surely it should be the parents that

are responsible for their own children, not irrelevant court judges

who don't have to deal with the consequences of their decision. Even

if the parents are apparently 'too overwhelmed' to decide what is

right for their children it is still their responsibility.

What ever decision is made regarding the twins there will inevitably

be ongoing arguments against what ever happens, and this is

unavoidable as I'm sure the judges very well know.

More about The Conjoined Twins Jodie and Mary

Open Document