Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of religion in human society
Impact of religion in human society
Effect of religion in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There is much religious content included in this Documentary, called for the BIBLE tells me so. Its main focus is how people of different religions handle the topic of homosexuality. It is a very controversial topic and people have various opinions on it, whether it is that they support it or that they think it is an abomination from God. The video includes many different people’s personal views on homosexuality and many of them think the same way, which is that the Bible says it is an abomination and a sin. Religious people get conditioned by churches and other religious buildings to believe certain things and go against others. There is always something religious people will be against; whether it is something complex like gay marriage …show more content…
They had a son who also participated in the church and its events. He turned out to be gay and people were shocked. He first noticed he was different when his friends were interested in a Play boy magazine and he wasn’t. At this point, he didn’t tell anyone because he knew the bible said it was wrong to be a homosexual. He became more aware of the “gay” part of him and told his wife he was gay. He went home to tell his parents, who were shocked and weren’t comfortable with him being gay or having a relationship with another man. They still loved him and learned to accept him as he was; how God made him. He was a big part of an Episcopalian church and even became the bishop. Some people were against it of course, but others cheered him on. He even received death threats, but he kept moving along. The parents said God brought him there for a reason. He is a symbol that says gay people are good and God loves us for who we are, as he created us the way he wanted us to …show more content…
The mother said that people understand the Bible more as time goes on. She said god made Adam and Eve so they could procreate; homosexuals can’t procreate. She prayed that her son and daughter would not turn out gay. The daughter, Tonya, turned out lesbian and her parents didn’t accept her lifestyle. She started a LGBT support group at Yale, where she went to college, and met her first girlfriend. She said that people interpret the Bible in different ways depending on the person and the location. For example, she, as a lesbian, will view it differently than a straight person. The same would go for race and gender. Also, the time period affects how people view social issues. As the years go on, the act of homosexuality is becoming more widely accepted. Even the location affects how people view this issue. For example, on man from the video says people accept homosexuals more up north than they do down
The four cultural events analyzed in this section are: Christians justification for racism and slavery, the history of women in the Bible and in the religious community, the treatment of Jews by religious peoples, and the general negative opinion of homosexualy amount Bible readers. Gomes explains that in these four events, people did use, or are using, the Bible to justify their hatred of different groups. He also brings up the fact that Christians and other religious people have since apologized for their treatment of women, African Americans, and Jews. By saying this he heavily implies his belief that, once again, Christians are going to be on the wrong side of the debate in regard to homosexuality. The section on homosexuality is the most relevant in this part as it is a current event that is still debate nationwide.
The lecture hall filled with the audience members’ conversations in the gymnasium-sized room, which the microphone on the podium in center stage amplified. Through the double door entrance to the hall walked a conference attendee named Adam Moore, who found his seat in the last of many perfectly aligned rows of folding chairs. He began reading the brochure handed to him as he arrived and “homosexuality” being on the list of discussion topics intrigued him because he is an openly homosexual member of the Episcopal Church. After all the discussions had concluded and the ministers and clergy answered every question, Moore approached Father McAllister and asked him to explain some of the Catholic Church’s teachings to him. Father McAllister happily agreed and they both returned to the lecture hall to have their conversation. Father McAllister sat next to Moore, who reclaimed his conference seat. Moore explained that although there were many topics he did not fully understand in Catholic Church teaching, there was only one he wanted to discuss with him. He sought to understand what the Catholic Church taught on the topic of homosexuality and what the Church’s opposition was to homosexual relationship...
The first story centers on Gene Robinson, now the first openly gay Episcopal bishop, and the son of a loving, church-going couple from Kentucky. Next, we meet the Poteats, a Baptist family from North Carolina with a gay son and daughter. Then there are the Reitans, from Minnesota, whose son Jake comes from a long line of Lutheran pastors. When Jake came out of the closet, some of the locals threw a brick through their windshield and wrote “fag” in chalk outside the house. The mother’s description of immediately scrubbing the profanity off the driveway was very poignant. Perhaps the most heartbreaking story was that of Mary Lou Wallner, a Christian fundamentalist who rejected her lesbian daughter, which ...
“For The Bible Tells Me So” by Daniel Karslake is a documentary style film that focuses on issues about sexuality. The film focuses on the conflict between homosexuality and Christianity and the analysing of several Bible verses about homosexuality. The film attempts to alter the minds of homophobes by using facts, science and several interviews with Christians who also have gay children. The interviews are done with five American, very Christian families and “how they handle the realization of having a gay child” (Karslake, 2007.)
In the book “The Art of Biblical Narrative” by Robert Alter, there is one chapter (Chapter 3) titled “Biblical Type-Scenes and the Uses of Convention” (Alter 47). Alter describes several different stories (but similar in some ways) in the Old Testament that can be difficult to interpret in today’s culture. Alter describes how reading any book (more specifically the Bible), requires use of conventions, which he describes as “… an elaborate set of tacit agreements between artist and audience about the ordering of the art work is at all times the enabling context in which the complex communication of art occurs” (Alter 47). In other words, an agreement of how the writing is done; it can be pretty complex as well. He states that there are stories in the Bible that have the same stories of narrative, but there are different characters, they often are told several times in the Bible. Alter uses several of examples, like how patriarch is driven by famine; or where someone is found and is invited to eat with them, or a betrothal (engagement) near a well/body
Christian Fundamentalists translate verse 22 of Leviticus 18 to say, “Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.” This makes it clear that Christian fundamentalists are against homosexuality. The commentary states, “Homosexuality is absolutely forbidden, for it is an enormous sin.” Fundamentalist Christians view the Bible as the word of God in plain sense. They believe that the Bible is the closest and truest version of God’s actual words, since they believe that God spoke
Like Wilkins’s piece this narrative was very easy to follow. But where the two differ is Savory’s piece has more details to make her point and even includes other stories she has read or been told. It could have just as easily been a jumbled mess, but all the details she included lead into one another and kept a constant flow. Take for example these few sentences, “In the past, the Bible has been used to justify slavery, segregation, and even denying women the right to vote. As the daughter of a minister, all of this seems strange to me. Like my father, I would like to think that religion is better suited to promoting love—not hate.” (Savory). The detail of how in the past people have used religion to justify their hate leads right into her talking about being a preacher’s daughter. Another effective point in Savory’s writing is the constant use of symbols. Such as the light vs. dark symbol that is so important it is even the title of the story. In this case the symbol of the light being acceptance and the dark being any form of hate. For example, “The way I saw it, if I turned off the spotlight, no one would be able to see the real me. In the darkness, it was easier to hide.” (Savory). But another constant symbol is that of her linking the way African Americans were treated and how homosexuals were treated. She links her experience of what happened with the civil rights movement and what
...hat they choose to be homosexual. They choose to love who they love and be attracted to whom they are attracted to. Being that I am a Christian, I believe that homosexuality is a sin; however, I am neither for nor against homosexuality.
...because the bible does not state that, two of the same gender can live together. It does state that we should love one another, but like most argument, certain bible verses are push aside to fit the position argued. How convent that the opposition against gays deal with religious and normal hardships that anyone can face on day-to-day bases. Since there is no accurate data on same-sex raising children does any damage, be happy that the children are going to a good home. Culture should step aside as well. America is called a melting pot for a reason, no matter were we come from we all learn to leave with each other’s differentness. It is ashamed that America only fully comes together if tragic events like, 9-11, New Orleans after Katrina, or World Wars occur. All opposition against one another should boil down, and America becomes the strong nation it was once again.
In this essay, I will explain how religion is sometimes used to mobilize against LGBT people, how some people’s religious and personal doctrines conflict regarding LGBT issues, and how religious belief and community can be a positive force for the LGBT community.
Homosexuality is no exception. Twisted enough, and mistranslated enough, the Bible can create grounds for many opinions, however far out they may seem. What is important to understand is the fact that not a single person is completely rid of bias. The opinions of important figures, from preacher to presidential hopeful, are influenced by more than just the Bible. Culturalism plays a huge role, if not the largest role, in creating popular opinion when it comes to the Conservative Christian community and topics such as homosexuality. There are over 30000 verses in the Bible, yet only seven verses are believed to mention homosexuality, and of these, all seven have explanations as to why viewing them as God’s hatred of homosexuals is wrong and even ignorant is some cases. Conservative Christians used the Bible to justify slavery decades ago. Now they use it to justify the hatred of homosexuality. While the fault does not lie with each individual Conservative Christian, the community, and particularly its leaders, are responsible for recognizing the effects of culturalism and the influence exerted by religious leaders. Until the community takes responsibility for it, there will be no change when it comes to homosexuality, or future controversial
My best friend at the time invited me to go to church camp with her for a week during the summer. I was not raised with religion, but I thought it would be enjoyable to spend time at the camp anyway. While I was there I remember the pastor, for some reason, saying that on a previous day he had been flipping through the television channels. He said that he ended up landing on a reality television program that showed two boys kissing. I was not at all prepared for what he would say next. The pastor went on to say that the scene was repulsive and it should not have been allowed on television. I remember observing others around the room, and seeing everybody around me acting disgusted for the same reason that the pastor was. I was the only person acting disgusted for other reasons. I had never heard or realized before that gay people are not widely accepted. I was very irritated at the pastor, and because of that, he made me angry at religion. I started having questions about the LGBT community for the first
The information should be correct and be reliable in order for the audience to be persuaded. Jacob references about three/four different points about homosexual marriage. The first reference made was about a 2004 General Accounting office releasing a point that well over a thousand rights were denied to homosexual couples. This reference shows in numbers how many rights are denied to them, and because there is a lot if indicates a stress. Homosexual already endure social discrimination, the government not allowing them to have basic rights, adds political discrimination as well. A second reference was made that a scientist discovered that there are environmental and biological influence on sexual orientation. This shows reference that people don’t wake up and make a decision to be a homosexual; there are biologically factors in the body that distinguish that for you. In fact, most homosexuals feel as if they were born that way. Jacob also refers to a 1991 discovery in which parts of the brain that control sexual activity are different in homosexuals than they are in heterosexuals. This was a very a vital indication that having a specific orientation is not a choice. A third reference Jacob makes is the homosexual population, he states its about 5% of U.S. citizens are homosexual. This is not a large
There are many opponents of gay people as it is, and they all have their reasons to dislike the idea of permitting them get married. One of the main reasons is that the primary purpose of marriage is procreation. Because gay couples are unable to have children, they should not be allowed to marry (Schiffen 495). Another main argument is that the word marriage means the union of one man and one woman. This is a long-standing theme of most major Western religions. Under a proposed bill known as the Defense of Marriage act, marriage is defined as “a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.” Furthermore, it defines a spouse as “ a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife” (What 1). Under these guidelines, it is quite obvious that gay couples would not be eligible for marriage. People against homosexual marriage also say that it is a person’s choice to be gay. Since the individual chooses to be a homosexual, they should not be given special privileges. Another argument that you hear is that these couples should not get married simply because of the torment and ridicule they would be faced with in their everyday lives. There are news reports from across America telling about how a gay person was beaten or killed just because they were looked at as different. Some of these people would end up the target of verbal abuse and maybe even physical abuse, just because some heterosexual people see them as different.
When one hears the words “LGBT” and “Homosexuality” it often conjures up a mental picture of people fighting for their rights, which were unjustly taken away or even the social emergence of gay culture in the world in the1980s and the discovery of AIDS. However, many people do not know that the history of LGBT people stretches as far back in humanity’s history, and continues in this day and age. Nevertheless, the LGBT community today faces much discrimination and adversity. Many think the problem lies within society itself, and often enough that may be the case. Society holds preconceptions and prejudice of the LGBT community, though not always due to actual hatred of the LGBT community, but rather through lack of knowledge and poor media portrayal.