For a long time people have debated over the idea of whether or not imprisonment for life is better or worse than the death penalty. I would say that the answer to this is very subjective. It all depends on the crime committed, privileges and treatment given, whether or not the sentenced is in solitary confinement, and the prisoner’s own opinion.
Sentencing someone to death is generally seen as an extremely cruel punishment, as killing someone for any reason is considered immoral. But is that really true? In the short story ‘The Bet,’ by Anton Chekkov, a banker starts up an argument over whether or not the life sentence or the death penalty is better. He states his opinion in the first page. “‘I have not tried either the death penalty or
…show more content…
Studies have confirmed that quite a few of those convicted of capital crimes, and even some who were executed, were innocent. Being sentenced to life gives the chance that new evidence may be uncovered, and the innocent would be freed. But if someone truly did commit a terrible crime, the death sentence can be humane in some cases. When animals are too old to be useful or sick and in pain, we put them down. It was much more cruel back then, but now we have lethal injections that ensure the animal doesn’t feel too much pain. I believe this is similar to how a prison should sometimes operate. The prisoners who are too much of a danger for inmates and officers are placed in solitary confinement. They get to spend a very long time with almost no human contact. This always leads to them having psychological problems. It can be a waste to provide for these people who can’t function even in prison, and to be honest, I would rather die than spend my life in solitary …show more content…
Many prisons grant their prisoners certain rights. These may include the access to mailing letters, books, radios, and even television. Some are even allowed jobs, so you can still have a pretty comfortable life. While serving a life sentence, I believe that there is a point where you just accept your new life. I’m sure that people who were sentenced felt very depressed in the beginning, but after a while, they adapt to their new lifestyle. It might not be the best, but there are still many positives. There are new kinds of rewards, punishments, and even relationships. You still have some freedoms, even if they are simple ones, and you can find satisfaction in the little things life has to offer. Taking a person’s life takes away their chance at finding this new
Capital punishment is not an effective punishment or deterrent for murder or any crime for various reasons. To many prisoners, being detained in a prison is much more of a punishment than death as is it a constant, conscious deprivation of liberty and rights. This idea is represented though US Oklahoma bomber Timothy McVeigh who claimed after dropping his appeals against his death sentence that he would rather die than...
Like stated earlier, you lose all sense of being able to do what you want when you want it. Prisoners are told to do virtually everything they do such as when to eat, sleep, wake up, or work. This can cause a huge problem while the prisoner is still in prison and also when the prisoner is finally released. In a study done by Margaret Leigey and Michael Ryder they find that there are three issues that life without parole (LWOP) inmates have. Those issues are, “indeterminacy, permanent separation from family members, and the possibility of mental deterioration as a result of prolonged confinement.” (Leigey and Ryder, 2015, p.
I do not consider the death penalty to be cruel and unusual punishment for persons convicted of one or more murders. For instance, my example of a convicted criminal deserving of the death penalty is Andrea Yates. I believe the only adequate justice for the murder of her five children is that she be given the death penalty. What she did to those children was certainly cruel and unusual and since she was given a fair trial by a jury of her peers and found guilty she be subject to death due to the heinous nature of the multiple homicides she committed. To spite my personal disdain for her actions under the law she and persons like her are still entitled to a fair trail (which she already had), as well as the appeals process, but I feel strongly that the death penalty should be used in place of life sentencing.
...ngs Police Department. Life imprisonment with out the possibility of parole is an equally effective, cheaper, and more humane way to punish capital criminals. Not only is the cost of executing a prisoner ridiculous, but the death penalty has in no way shown that it deters criminal activity. The abolishment of the death penalty is necessary to achieve the utopian society we as a nation so desire.
Having the death penalty in our society is not cruel or unusual punishment as it is
While it may seem that keeping someone in prison for life would cost more than putting someone on the death penalty, howev...
...already in there for life, there is nothing to stop him or her from killing other prisoners on a spree. The death penalty ensures more safety in that sense, because the prisoner will most likely consider his punishment of life sentence as bad enough and not want anything worse.
Life imprisonment can be worse of a punishment than death for many convicted murderers. Instead of an easy out, these people will have to live out their lives without many of the freedoms and rights you and I ta...
...must face the consequences of his or her actions each day as long as he or she is alive. As a result, I believe life imprisonment without the option of parole is a similar and comparable punishment to the death penalty.
There are always two sides to every issue and capital punishment or life imprisonment is no different. This has been a very controversial issue for decades and still is today. Capital Punishment also known as the death penalty is defined as being the penalty of death for a crime. Some feel that capital punishment should be abolished because it is cruel; others believe life in prison is just as cruel. There are many reasons for the support of Capital Punishment and for Life in Prison.
Some prisoners are claustrophobic; they can’t be in small tight places for example their prison cell. The prisoners were used to being on the streets doing whatever they felt they wanted to do; now they got to follow rules and do as they’re told. Inmates with life sentences have to stay in prison until they’re no longer alive, knowing that some even try to commit suicide. No one would like to be in prison for life, just thinking about can make everyone scared. Inmates serving life in prison are able to get special services, depending on their conduct. Inmates have double celled housing space for themselves, a person can get frustrated being small places and since the inmate is going to be there for life they want to at least let him feel good. The inmates also get employment opportunities, also depending in their conduct. They want the inmates to spend their time out of trouble and helping them get distracted can get them out of trouble. In some facilities the inmate can receive meals in their cells, in chow hall or in day room. Some facilities offer academic education; they offer adult basic education, GED, or special
capital punishment? With receiving life without parole the person has no chance of release by a parole board, even with good behavior. However, life sentences gives an inmate family and lawyer time to prove their innocence if they did not commit a crime. The wrongful execution of an innocent person is an injustice that can never be rectified. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty, 154 cases where men and women have been released from Death Row nationally, some only minutes away from execution. Inmates sentenced to capital punishment in recent years have had the privilege to get freedom due to the improvement of technology and how DNA evidence can prove they did not commit the crime. For example, my uncle who was sentenced to capital murder had evidence that could be tested for his DNA. During his trial evidence proved that his DNA was on none of the evidence presented but he had potential eye witness to identify him. The eye witnessed were paid friends of the other suspect involved in the crime. The witnesses later came back after his conviction and revealed they were paid and they lied about the stories. He was later executed but was never given a free chance to prove his innocence. It can be conceded that, if the maximum sentence an inmate could be given it could help free more innocent people. Supporters of the capital punishment feel it is beneficial because if a person kills someone they should be
It must be remembered that criminals are real people too, which have. life and with it, the feeling of pain, fear and the loss of their loved ones and all the other emotions that the rest of us feel. There is no such thing as a humane way of putting someone to death. Every type of execution causes the prisoner physical suffering, some. methods perhaps cause less than others, but be in no doubt that being.
The first reason why death penalty should be allowed and get more active is life sentence is costly. According to “What is the Average Cost to House Inmates in Prison”, the average cost of housing an inmate in the U.S. was $31,286 in 2012 for per year. According to the “Who, what, where and why”, the United States has roughly 2.4 million people in prisons. Therefore, the money which America pays to keep prisoners who are in prisons is about $75120000000 for per year.
If a criminal is sentenced to life in jail, then the cost of their imprisonment would be many times this. In the USA, the average cost per prisoner annually in jail is $29,000. The cost of the drugs used for the lethal injection is believed to be $86.08. This is far less than the cost of keeping a prisoner in jail, and would save the government money that could be used to try and make the community a better and safer place. Secondly, many believe that capital punishment is right because of the justice given to the victim’s family.