The American Paradigm In The 21st Century

1791 Words4 Pages

In order for American public schools to meet the changing needs of 21st century students, lead educators and administrators must reassess current practices and accepted pedagogies by analyzing factors which may be considered difficult or uncomfortable to address. These factors include issues of race, gender, socioeconomics, and ethnicity. The American paradigm is in a critical stage of flux due to vast shifts in technology, globalism, and social upheaval of the 20th century compounded by the sheer acceleration of these forces as the nation barrels through the first decades of the 21st century. The very ideals which form the collective American psyche now serve as points of contention and dissension as Americans confront social injustices, attempt …show more content…

Inevitably, the deciding factors separating the empowered and the overpowered are not surprising: economic status, gender, race, and ethnicity. Even in an age in which Americans pride themselves on being equitable, fair, color-blind purveyors of freedom and hope, Greene declares that “ethnic and racial prejudices are seemingly insuperable” (2000). As I read her words, many questions formed inside my mind. Is she correct in her judgment? Are human beings inherently prejudiced toward those who appear, behave, or believe differently than themselves? Is this our fate or can we intentionally retrain our hearts and minds to be better versions of who we already are? Are we fully able to consciously decide not to lean on presumptions and erroneous thought patterns? Is the “American Dream” a lost cause or simply a well-intentioned but misguided one worthy of close examination and reframing? The American public school is the ideal laboratory for this experiment in the possibilities of humanity – and the work is critical to the future of our …show more content…

Some of the issues she names are, “the use of drugs; birth control and the problem of abortion; decisions with regard to handguns; the predicament of foster children or abandoned children; child abuse; (and) the disintegration of numerous families” (Greene, 2000). The author goes on to assert that schools of the future must serve not only as houses of instruction, but as microcosmic societies charged with empowering students to go out into the greater world equipped with skills and knowledge beyond those solely “relevant to the larger issues of literacy” (Greene, 2000). I find this particular assertion troublesome because I do not believe these issues are new at all. If anything, I believe that today’s youth are more closely insulated from these issues than their parents were due to the many layers of prevention and protection in place within our society. That is not to say that children are always sheltered from these ills and traumas, but I don’t think the “good old days” mentality is accurate. Schools have long served as a bridge between home and society and teachers have long served as the hearts and hands of these schools. Conversely, I do concur with Greene’s insistence that schools reach beyond the confines of the traditional “four-subject” construct and begin to examine methodologies and vehicles for delivering student-centered learning and curriculum design.

Open Document