The Advisor-Advisee Relationship

876 Words2 Pages

While most college students see their advisor as someone who can help them register for classes, the reality is that there should be so much more to the advisor-advisee relationship. Even though college is referred to as the best years of a person’s life, they can also be the most daunting if students discover they have nobody who can counsel them as they make life-changing decisions. As an aspiring advisor, I hope to show my students that there is much more to than the academic component. Perhaps one of the most vital factors that contribute to a strong advisor-advisee relationship is the personal connection and trust that must be built. As a result, while it will be important to discuss a student’s academic progress, it is even more …show more content…

The disarm phase is similar to the idea of one-to-one advising in that it starts before any actual advising takes place. However, this phase emphasizes the set-up of the office environment and how that can make students feel either secure or intimidated. Furthermore, by greeting the student before they come in for their meeting, students are more likely to open up and connect with the advisor. In the discover phase, advisors have the opportunity to learn more about their student’s strengths and interests, which can be used in later phases to apply to their goals. During the dream and design phases, students have the chance to reflect on their goals and work with their advisor to make those dreams into a reality. However, it is not until the deliver phase that the student is given the utility to execute their goals. Finally, in the don’t settle phase, advisors must challenge their students’ growth and …show more content…

Given how much opportunity students have to develop through appreciative advising, there are a number of theories that resonate with this process. For example, Schlossberg’s Mattering and Marginality theory echoes the disarm and discover phases of appreciative advising since students have the opportunity to connect with someone who is open to supporting their aspirations. Similarly, Réndon’s Validation theory makes sure students feel supported throughout the entire advising process. However, the use of different phases allow a students’ development to foster since advisors are able to provide a unique set of tools and resources for each respective phase. Finally, Stanford’s Challenge and Support model is relevant to the design, deliver, and don’t settle phases of appreciative advising since even though a student may feel as if they lack the resources to achieve their goals, the advisor is always there to give the student a sense of comfort and encouragement. Furthermore, appreciative advising’s emphasis on the affective aspect of learning shows advisors how even though students are often coming in for appointments due to anxiety, frustration, and concern, advisors must help their students cope by increasing a student’s motivation and level of

Open Document