The Absentee Bishop In Residence Analysis

691 Words2 Pages

Dr. Jennifer DeSilva is a professor at Ball State University, as well as a contributor and editor of the book “Episcopal Reform and Politics in Early Modern Europe. ” Dr. DeSilva’s historical lens gravitates towards a Eurocentric view, including a focus on Italy between 1300-1700, Italy and the Papal Court, and the political, cultural, and social history of the Renaissance and Reformation. Dr. DeSilva’s also investigates the issues of identity-building, authority, and behavioral reform in early modern Europe. Her chapter, “The Absentee Bishop in Residence,” highlights larger interests and current research projects of DeSilva’s: The de’ Grassi family and the Holy Roman Church, in regards to the College of Cardinals. Due to my unfamiliarity with the topic of Absentee Bishops in Rome, it was initially difficult to decipher DeSilva’s argument. However, after thorough readings of the chapter, it is evident that Dr. DeSilva “seeks to uncover the connections that a single bishop, Paris de’ Grassi, established with his diocese in an effort to fulfill the contemporary call to reform the local church while managing his own absenteeism.”
The historian develops her argument by first clearly stating that the topic of “episcopal absenteeism [has] attracted few scholars.” This research is not …show more content…

Dr. DeSilva notes that there are “few documents extant that reveal the details of de’ Grassi’s interactions with the clergy of Pesaro,” but there is enough to confirm the bishop was so dedicated to the mission of reforming the church that fear did not prevent him from conflict with the clergy. An artifact and primary source DeSilvia implements to prove her subject’s commitment to spiritual reformation is a papal decree issued “supporting the new bishop” and simultaneously forced de’ Grassi’s adversary, Giovanni Francesco Soperchi, to submit to de’ Grassi’s

Open Document