One of the most persuasive arguments for term limits is the very real possibility that a president in office long enough can appoint the entire Supreme Court and much of the federal judiciary in general, thus jeopardizing the independence of the judicial branch and influencing the political direction of the country for much longer than any tenure he could have (Cronin 2015, 87). President Franklin Roosevelt was actually successful in appointing all nine justices of the Supreme Court during his tenure, and although unsuccessful, he had attempted to pack the court with his own justices in his second term. Presidential appointment power has also grown beyond the judiciary to include many executive agencies that have wide-reaching and greatly unchecked …show more content…
In fact, twenty-two of the past forty-four presidents have served only a single term or less, many of whom did so by choice. Both political parties and many presidents and candidates openly advocated for a single-term limit for the presidency throughout the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. The advantage of this single term would be that the presidency would be independent from other institutions. “The temptation of a president to compromise himself and, worse, the nation’s interests to achieve reelection would be eliminated, and a president would be committed to the public interest” (Korzi 2011, 53). A single term would also relieve the president of the burdens associated with reelection (162). Those who advocated for a single-term however, were often quick to abandon the notion when their candidate had the real possibility of a second or even a third term. It is also notable that, even allowing for the political time, the single term presidents of the eighteenth century are often considered the least effective and least memorable. This could be construed as positive or negative depending on the preferred strength of the
The president is a very significant role in not only the U.S., but all around the world. As a matter of fact, the president has a great impact on our country in many ways as well, including relationships and trade. In order for us to have good relationships and trades with the country below us, we would need a strong president. If the presidential term limit was extended, there would be more strong presidents, less weak presidents, the ability to follow through with plans/changes, and less adjusting. This would impact the U.S. and Canada, and other countries all around the world in a positive way. Our society is falling to hatred, bad decisions, and a lack of unity and strength, which could all be reduced or prevented by a strong, beneficial
John Adams virtually eradicated his chances of easily winning the election of 1800 by defying the hardcore patriotic attitude of many Americans. Through his continued acts, regardless if they were what was best for the country at that particular time or is he believed morally that it was the correct decision, such as approving the Alien and Sedition Acts and helping the British soldiers that were involved in the Boston Massacre, he left no room for himself to take an easy path to the presidency much less any path to the presidency.
The 22nd Amendment creates a lame duck and which stops abuse of power3. Presidents in their second term have been seen to usually suffer diminished power, particularly after the second midterm elections. This diminish of power creates a lame duck. The president becoming a lame duck, stops him from being able abuse of power. The 22nd Amendment also stops the country from being a monarchy. US. Senators and Congressmen don’t have term limits because their voices are balanced by opposing parties in their chambers, the presidency is different. The president has no similar
Term limits could increase the quality of the Supreme Court nominees. One of the driving factors behind a Supreme Court nominee is their age (Ringhand np). Individuals over 60 years of age are less likely to be appointed. This means presidents intentionally exclude a large number of highly qualified individuals from serving on our nation’s highest court (Ringhand np). Term limits resolve this problem. Furthermore, the threat of a justice’s cognitive decline may be reduced, since there would no longer be a temptation to hold out for a strategically timed retirement.
The 22nd amendment reads: “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President, when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the
...tion we must ask ourselves is, “Why is it in the best interest of our Country to limit the number of terms our president can serve, but not in our best interest to limit the number of terms served by our Congressional representatives?”
...deralists voiced was their dislike of the “four year term with indefinite re-eligibility.” The Constitution called for the President to be elected by the “electoral college” which removed the concern of Congress “controlling” the Executive and the Concern the Executive would appease Congress to be reappointed. The election process would ensure the President was on his best behavior if he desired to be re-elected. By establishing the four year term the Constitution protected the office from becoming a monarchy due to the fact that if a President migrated too much toward monarchical rule they would simply not be re-elected. Another advantage of the four year term with the eligibility of being re-elected was stability, it allowed for the continuation of good Executive policy and the ability to change if the policy was in line with what the electors desired.
The tenure reform was introduced by the Government under the Localism Act 2011 which allowed Local Authorities the freedom and flexibility to introduce a new forms of tenancies. These flexible tenancies allowed social landlords from the 1st April 2012 to offer all new tenants, a tenancy which would be for a fixed term. This was introduce to try and end long term open ended tenancies for public sector tenants and to allow more flexibility for the housing providers to fix tenancies for a period time minimum 2 years, maximum 5 years. Although existing tenants will not be affected by the change in tenancies, and are still secure in their tenancy. By providing flexible tenancies, allows social landlords to be able to manage their social housing more effectively and deliver a better service for local communities. Although not all local housing authorities decided to use
Presidential power has become a hot topic in the media the in recent years. There has been extensive debate about what a president should be able to do, especially without the involvement of Congress and the American people. While this debate has become more publicized since the Bush administration, similar issues of presidential power date back to Truman and the Korean War. As with much of the structure of the U.S. government, the powers of the president are constantly evolving with the times and the executives.
"Elections, especially of representatives and counselors, should be annual, there not being in the whole circle of the sciences a maxim more infallible than this, 'where annual elections end, there slavery begins.' These great men . . . should be [chosen] once a year — Like bubbles on the sea of matter bourn, they rise, they break, and to the sea return. This will teach them the great political virtues of humility, patience, and moderation, without which every man in power becomes a ravenous beast of prey." —John Adams
One man’s bullet would force him into the presidency, and but for one man’s vote he would have been forced out.
When the United States was founded, the theme behind the new government was to establish an efficient system without doling out too much power to any one person. The Founders intended to prevent a rebirth of tyranny, which they had just escaped by breaking away from England. However, when members of Congress such as Tom Foley, who served as a Representative from 1964 through 1995, and Jack Brooks, who served as a Representative from 1952 through 1994, remain in the legislative system for over forty years, it is evident that tyranny has not necessarily been eradicated from the United States (Vance, 1994, p. 429). Term limits are a necessity to uphold the Founders’ intentions, to prevent unfair advantages given to incumbents, and to allow a multitude of additional benefits.
According to Linz, term limits in presidentialism force a president to serve a country for a fixed period of time
Let’s face it, elections are nothing but a popularity contest and Americans are stupid. It’s pathetic what kind of people are considered popular and even more pathetic what kind of people end up in government. If Americans don’t start taking government more seriously and start making more educated decisions about what kind of people are elected into office, we could be in real trouble in the future.
If you leave one person in congress for too long then they will never change their views and nothing new will ever get done. If there was a three of four term limit then people would work harder to get things done faster and pass bills that benefit the people because they know that they will only get reelected now because of that. With term limits in place, Congress will be more responsible toward their constituents because they will soon be constituents themselves. They...