Even though the critics do not think that genetic medicine is safe, Americans should all support genetic testing because the testing is revolutionary, more effective, and can cause major diseases to fade away. This is why and why genetic testing should be used to enhance regular medicine. If society supports genetic experimentation, the United States of America can lead countries into a modern day medical renaissance in a new and exciting part of science and technology which can revolutionize the world. Scientists are currently working to develop a new branch of medical help. This new study is challenging the way people think about DNA.
After the inspiration of the human genome project scientists developed theories that gene therapy is possible. After a series of experiments that then failed, scientists were discouraged and the future of gene therapy is now being doubted. Gene therapy is an idea that has fascinated humans and scientists for centuries. Gene therapy theoretically can allow scientists to change the human genome and peoples DNA. Ideally, scientists wish to replace “bad genes” in your DNA that can potentially hurt you with good genes that will help you avoid any genetic ailment.
Gene therapy is a technique used for correcting defective genes responsible for disease development. This relatively new idea sparks much controversy when societal implications are examined. Bill Joy, chief scientist and co-founder of Sun Microsystems, comments that “we can easily imagine an arms race developing over GNR [genetics, nanotechnology, and robotics] technologies, as it did with the NBC [nuclear, chemical, and biological] technologies in the 20th century….This time…we aren't in a war …we are driven, instead, by our habits, our desires, our economic system, and our competitive need to know (Joy, 2000)." This paper provides an in depth look at gene therapy including a description as well as an examination of gene therapy as it affects societal issues. Faced with different applications for the recent knowledge gained in gene therapy, ethical considerations must be analyzed so that society can move forward with caution.
"On the Limits of Human Gene Transfer: Drawing the Line" Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Feb. 19997: 43-53. Wadman, Meredith. "Germline Gene Therapy Must be Spared Excessive Regulation" Nature 26 March 1998: 317. "What is Gene Therapy?" Transgene 1999 Internet.
One of the most controversial topics discussed in the world of medicine pertained to the topic of genetic engineering. Some doctors saw it as tool of world destruction, however many of them seeing it as a chance of potential cures and treatments. Charles Darwin first introduced this idea. In his first publication, The Origin of Species, he introduced the idea of survival of the fittest. He stated that evolutionary change was only possible due to the genetic variation between each generation, including the combination of different characteristics.
Is it ethical to tamper with an individual's set of genetic instructions? If so, where do we draw the line?9 In the fall of 1999, the ethical issues surrounding gene therapy came to the forefront of the field with the first death of a gene therapy patient, Jesse Gelsinger.1 Gene therapy may contain inherent dangers that are not always obvious at first glance, as was illustrated more recently in a gene therapy trial involving SCIDs victims. Consequently, several new standards for gene therapy have been put into place regulating gene transfer trials to improve patient safety.
Embryonic stem cells have advantages because they would be toxin free, but adult stem cells are just as capable (Simmonds). Even with arguments stating “Adult Stem cells cannot offer the same therapeutic and research potential”, one side will not win the fight (Simmonds). Every type of stem cell will be researched and used to find the cure to fight any disease. There will always be a need for embryonic stem cell research, but if it is only destroying one life to save thousands: is it worth it? (“The Stem Cell Debate: is it over?
The main idea of the page is the problems with stem cell research not because it is a problem for pro-life communities but on the level of scientific research. He goes on to explain that stem cell research has its problems because research has show that these can cause tumors to grow and spread thru out the body. The information given by Deem is is not bias. It has very strong points and makes on cautious to the research. Although this source does not support my thesis it has a very scientific way of attacking the research thru failures in working with stem cells.
Stem cells derived from human embryos are known as embryonic stem cells. Since the discovery of embryonic stem cells, federal guidelines have been established in the United States as a result of the ethical controversy that has arisen in relation to the derivation of stem cells. Regulations regarding the limited permission of embryonic stem cell research as a consequence of continuous moral debates should be lessened for the reason that such cells pose ample therapeutic benefits for a myriad of suffering individuals. Certainly, stem cells convey the potentiality to produce beneficial treatments for a diverse range of medical conditions. Various illnesses could be cured if embryonic stem cell research was permitted to expand.
Gene Therapy is Revolutionizing Medicine "We used to think that our fate was in our stars, but now we know that, in large measure, our fate is in our genes, "quotes James Watson. This fate that Watson is talking about is contained in our genes, and deals with a new technique, gene therapy. Gene therapy is revolutionizing the world of medicine. Many physicians are predicting that in twenty years gene therapy may change the practice of medicine from a treatment-based to a prevention-based practice. Our future is l ocked away inside of our genes.