Tale Of Three Coming Out Stories By Angelou Analysis

433 Words1 Page

Social inclusion has been an ever-increasing issue, causing protests and even violence not only in America but, worldwide. Angelou, Gay, and Staples discussed these topics in their essays, listed in The Norton Reader, from different aspects but with a common perspective. Each essay is an argument on prejudice and injustice. Still, the question to ask is: what approach aids in discussing such a sensitive topic effectively? In Angelou's essay, Graduation, she narrated the story of a single event (45-54). Although she wrote a heartfelt essay, arguably, her approach does not address social inclusion on a large scale and consequently weakens her defense. In fact, without information beyond the account of her graduation, the reader becomes limited …show more content…

Gay in a sense is writing her own opinion essay based on supporting evidence from the Marriage Protection Act (178), Garret Keizer's Privacy (179), an Iowa lesbian couple's story (183), along with several others. Her use of numerous occurrences over time enhances support for her argument that, all should make sacrifices for the greater good (183). Though she does not impart her own accounts, she brings concrete evidence from numerous sources to defend her claims. Hence, Gay's tactic fortifies her argument via actualities. Contrarily, Staples references several personal instances of exclusion, in Black Men and Public Space (267-269). He references accounts of countless people's behavior in his presence at night (267) and the measures he adopts to prevent their disquiet (269). Not only does he tell his encounters, but he explains how he fits a criminal's description (268). His essay is a wonderful explanation of his experience, but it begs to question whether he truly addresses discrimination as a problem. It seems his approach minimizes the issue from social injustice to simply accepting impartial

Open Document