Summary Of Why Gender Equality Stalled By Stephanie Coontz

971 Words2 Pages

With every year that passes the United States is changing. Its people are changing. Along with all these changes, so are our morals and the way that we view the world around us. In Stephanie Coontz’s article, Why Gender Equality Stalled, we are walked through her views on gender equality and the progression with the partial influence of feminism. With her opinion and other points of view Stephanie Coontz is arguing that we need to treat “work-family policy issues” as a human rights issue. She claims that these issues affect everyone that are apart the household; parents, children, and elders. After analyzing her article, I have concluded that I fully agree with her statements and arguments that women and men should have equal rights, …show more content…

“Over the next 30 years this emphasis on equalizing gender roles at home as well as at work produced a revolutionary transformation in Americans’ attitudes” (Coontz 2013, p.1). By using statistics from the 1960’s and 70’s Coontz’s claims became more personal. She is proceeding to argue that American’s have made a leap in gender equality. Later in her argument, she states that by the 2000’s the revolution began to stall. This came with the change of feminist’s outlook on their …show more content…

Although she is suggesting that they support her argument, she does not want them to claim the movement. She claims that, “Gender equality has not stalled. It has hit a wall.” I believe that with the new way of supporting feminism we as a society have forced this pause in the advancement of equality. By agreeing with Stephanie Coontz, I have been able to view feminism from her point of view. In the 1960’s feminism was lacking ‘political-ness’. Instead, feminists were more focused on the transformation of a woman’s personal consciousness. “Under present conditions, the intense consciousness rising about the “rightness” of personal choices that worked so well in the early days of the women’s movement will end up escalating the divisive finger-pointing that stands in the way of political

Open Document