Summary Of A Society Of One By Zora Neale Hurston

1774 Words4 Pages

Within her article, A Society of One: Zora Neale Hurston, American Contrarian, Claudia R. Pierpont, a writer and journalist for The New Yorker, tells, analyzes, and gives foundation to Zora Neale Hurston’s backstory and works. Throughout her piece, as she gives her biography of Hurston, she deeply analyzes the significance of Richard Wright, author of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, as he accuses Hurston of “cynically perpetuating a minstrel tradition meant to make white audiences laugh”(Pierpont 3). By doing so, Wright challenges Hurston’s authority to speak for the “black race” as he claims that her works do not take a stance, rather she only writes to please the “white audience.”As his critiques show to be oppressive, Pierpont reminds the reader the …show more content…

This behavior is seen in Janie’s store when she claims she has never played checkers, to which Tea Cake says, “‘Dis is de last day for dat excuse. You got uh board round heah?’ He set it up and began to show her” (95). By motivating Janie to play checkers, an activity that she has never been allowed to do, Tea Cake breaks the gender roles for Janie and becomes an advocate for feminism. Before her confrontation with Tea Cake, Janie had been trapped in the store for years constantly being silenced by Joe and always reminded of what a woman’s proper place is. According to Joe, checkers was not an activity for a woman, one meant for common men. Tea Cake continues his feminist behavior when he takes Janie fishing late at night, to which she thinks, “it was so crazy digging worms by lamp light and setting out for Lake Sabelia after midnight that she felt like a child breaking rules” (102). Tea Cake's suggestion that he and Janie go fishing at midnight not only symbolizes his individuality but also highlights his desire to go against Janie’s original social norms. Janie has always wished to feel young and abandon her expectations as a wife. Tea Cake, in this moment, takes the initiative for Janie allowing her to move forward in her life. Through his actions, Tea Cake breaks these boundaries set by Joe thereby creating a new impression of gender …show more content…

As Janie has said, she has “been tuh de horizon and back” (191) — she has experienced both the societal gender role mindset of Nanny and the feminist mindset of Tea Cake. Whenever Janie interacts with a new character, her feelings toward that person seems to be determined by their belief in conformity or feminism. Characters who represent the conformist view in society seem to become despised in Janie’s mind, whereas she falls deeply in love with those who encourage her free will. This is evident throughout the novel in many cases including Nanny and Logan against Tea Cake. Joe, however, is an exception as he deceives Janie as representing her freedom from Logan, but ultimately still acts misogynistic towards her. As Pierpont recognizes that Their Eyes were Watching God seems to be a translation of Hurston’s beliefs into a story, the novel gains a new foundation of meaning. Thus, Their Eyes Were Watching God does not primarily advocate against the racial divide between black and white. Rather, the story stands as evidence for the fight for women's

Open Document