Steakout Case Study Examples

1469 Words3 Pages

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
BACKGROUND
Hoagie Steakout is located in South Third Street in San Jose California. It is a small family run restaurant owned and operated by husband and wife, Mr. Paik and Mrs Kim under YP Enterprises dba Hoagie Steakout. Mr. Paik and Mrs. Kim and family came to United States in 2011 under E-2 Visa. On October 31, 2011, Mr. Paik and Mrs. Kim purchased the existing business, assumed the lease from previous owner and operated the business since. Mr. Paik and Mrs. Kim purchased this “Turn-Key Operation” as is and made no other alteration or renovation on the structure. Prior improvements, building inspection and permits required and applications were completed by the previous business owner in 2007. City …show more content…

Defendants’ agree that the entrance to the Facility is located up a flight of steps and there is no available ramp or elevator for Plaintiff to enter the Facility. However, removal of the step was not readily achievable. In fact, the process, the alteration and removal of architectural barrier of a Victorian house would be costly, contrary to Plaintiff’s claim that removal of these barriers to be without difficulty or expense. In addition, Defendants did not refuse to remove the barriers as stated in the complaint. Although, the requested alteration, renovation and modification impose an undue financial burden to the defendants, EnS Associates since January has been in consultation with office of Hansen Architect, had retained their service to conduct feasibility calculation to identify the corrections that needed to be made. Defendants have been taking affirmative steps to enable the business premises to meet all applicable access standards. In addition, the Facility has posted an ADA renovation in progress sign in front of their doors. EnS Associate, in partner with Hoagie Steakout, are in the process of installing a lift. However, planning, …show more content…

CACA provides for an automatic stay and early settlement and evaluation conference to resolve construction-related accessibility claims.
Civil Code Section 55.54(b)(1) states in relevant part:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon being served with a summon and complaint asserting a construction-related accessibility claim, including, but not limited to a claim brought under Section 51, 54, 54.1 or 55, a qualified defendant may file a request for a court stay and early evaluation conference in the proceedings of that claim prior to or simultaneous with qualified defendant’s responsive pleading or other initial appearance in the action that include the claim.
Civil Code section 55.52(a)(8) provides:
“Qualifed defendant” means a defendant in an action that includes a construction-related accessibility claim that is asserted against a place of public accommodation that met the requirements of CASp-inspected or “CASp determination pending” prior to the date the defendant was served with the summons and complaint in that

Open Document