Socio-Political Marginalization And Political Marginalisation

1912 Words4 Pages

To examine how the socio-economic status of the Malays corresponds to their political marginalisation, we must first establish that they are indeed politically marginalised. Political marginalisation can be taken to mean low political interest and low political trust, “indicating a feeling of distance to the political sphere of society” (Oskarson, 2010, p.7), and it is intrinsically linked to the theoretical concept of political efficacy, that is, an individual’s feelings of their own potential influence on politics, as well as their faith and trust in the government. (Southwell, 1985, Craig, 1990). There are varying views of the political marginalisation of the Malays between politicians and historians.

2.1.1 Politicians

The most representative sources presenting the official view of the marginalisation of the Malays came from the ruling elite. Indeed, the controversial issue of Malay marginality has been widely debated over the years, In the 1970s, the Majlis Pusat, or Central Council of Malay Cultural Organisations, organised a national seminar on “Malay Participation in the National Development”, which they deemed a “national problem” (Sharom & Wong, 1971, p.1), indicating that the Malays had a lack of interest in national and political issues. We see that the government needed to treat the Malays differently in order to deal with this issue, and “was constantly reiterating its recognition of the ‘special position’ of Malays and its commitment to overcome this imbalance” (Suratman, 2004, p.3), and this confirms that the Malays were indeed marginal in society.

However, the government’s perception of the issue of Malay marginality changed drastically by the turn of the century. Referring to allegations of Malay marginalisa...

... middle of paper ...

...n of the Malays in relation to the government’s policies. Amongst them include Rahim’s book (1999), which highlights the failure of meritocracy in Singapore due to the government’s employment of the cultural deficit thesis, which “absolves the state from the responsibilities of implementing structural reforms and actively assisting the marginalised community with the aim of narrowing the socio-economic and educational disparity between the ethnic communities” (p.247).Once again, we see that government policies, which may be have been intended to improve the marginalised status of the Malays, have worsened their socio-economic marginality.

However, these sources have only detailed the socio-economic marginality of the Malays without showing how it affects their political marginalisation. I will be discussing this in greater detail in the discussion chapter.

Open Document