Social Class Dbq

1256 Words3 Pages

Vitality in England during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries was not strictly determined by food, clean water, or a good paying job, but rather by the all-encompassing idea of social class. Being in a highly regarded social class provided better access to life’s necessities and frills. A business owner could afford more bread and appliances than a factory worker could, and an official in Parliament would most likely have more maids and land than a business owner. However, transitioning to a higher class was not the only way to improve someone’s social status. If the social class, as an entity, developed more of an influence, that class’ prestige could greatly increase, resulting in a greater reverence for all of its members. With this …show more content…

For example, some people believed that merchants, farmers, traders, and craftsmen were all in different classes (charts pg 371), while others believed that artisans were in a different class from industrial property owners (wc 8 pg 23). However, others believed that the real divides in class are based more on ideals. Neale believed that the middle class had to be concerned about property and social position while the middling class was more interested in removing the benefits that the upper class enjoyed (wc 8 pg 23). Political ideals also ripped classes apart; middle class men in the midlands did not share reform ideas with the anti-Whig middle class of the North (social and culture pg 153). In different jobs people required different things to improve their living, so it is expected that they would have different ideas about necessary reforms and political actions. Because of this, they struggled to make appeals as one group to benefit the middle class as a whole. Despite all of these believed partitions within the middle class, this paper will focus on people that are not factory workers and not upper class men living in urban or suburban areas in England during the eighteenth and nineteenth century. These people are the main focus because their population, money, and political power would not have …show more content…

People were given the chance to do this through a growing educational system. As the Industrial Revolution forged on and spread throughout the world, the Royal Commissions on Technical Education began to notice that England was falling behind France, Prussia, and the United States in industrial superiority due to their new innovations and more educated workers (pop primary pg 26 and wc 2 pg 90 ). Falling behind in global importance also related to less money for the common man, so individual capitalists started to strongly support universal education (wc 2 pg

Open Document