Slouching Towards Bethlehem By Joan Didion: An Analysis

1151 Words3 Pages

Throughout the 1960s, the people of the United States had very conflicted emotions about many situations occurring in their homeland or out in the foreign world. During this period, the Vietnam War was raging on as a fight of democracy against communism, as stipulated by the United States government. On the homefront, the hippies were thought of as either a necessary and revolutionary force to fight against social issues, or as a radical and useless group of youngsters who were only looking to cause problems. However, between the soldiers and hippies, they shared the similarity in how they felt internally, yet they did not convey their external actions in the same way. Within both groups, they each shared the fact in that they both wanted an …show more content…

The hippies and Vietnam War participants wished to escape the reality that they lived in. In Joan Didion’s essay, “Slouching Towards Bethlehem,” she constantly witnesses moments of these young “adults” attempting to escape their supposed-to-be life. One of the people she meets, Debbie, explained to Didion how she “wanted to be a veterinarian once,” but while saying that now she wants to be “an artist or a model or cosmetologist,” now, she retells the story of how she ran away from her parents because “they wouldn’t let [her] dress the way [she] wanted” (Didion 91). By saying this, Debbie proves how she despises anything of what she wanted to do or what her parents wanted her to do in the past. In affirming that she wants to be different now, instead of what following in the footsteps of her past goals, she now looks forward into a new and unknown reality. Furthemore, by abandoning her parents, she exemplifies her feeling of running away from her former realistic expectations. Because she left her parents behind in the dark, her attitude of starting a new life in what she wants to do moves along her ambition to withdraw from the real world. Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, also demonstrates this point. During the first moments of the books, O’Brien …show more content…

Returning to Didion and her essay, the hippies approach their movement by revolutionizing movements to protest against domestic problems. In one specific moment during her journaling, she witnesses an actual hippie protest, supporting African-American rights. However, in their mission to make a promising and effective statement, they, in turn, do the exact opposite of that. As the protesters in this movement, referred to as the Mime Troupers, were in blackface, a Negro was “beginning to get annoyed” and “get mad” at this blasphemy of their ultimate ideals, while one Mime Troupe that “[jeered] ‘What’d America ever do for you?’” was “gonna start something” with the Negro and the group associated with him (Didion 126). Didion’s revealing of these events help illustrate the method of how the hippies dealt with what they believed in. By interpreting what she wrote about, it is easy to understand how the protests that they conducted included a sense of readicality and limited thinking when carrying it out. To be politically incorrect by being racist during their protests and executing it with no change in what they are arguing for, it is demonstrated that the hippies externally protested with no purpose at all, and it is their actions made themselves perceived in the 1960s. The actions of the other 1960s group, the War soldiers, differed greatly from what occurred in the

Open Document