3. Since Matthew and Luke are not modern day biographies, they do not follow the standard that we imagine. I think the explanation for the combination of similarities and differences comes from the fact that the Matthew and Luke are styled differently and also have different audiences. Since Matthew and Luke are interpreting history for a specific audience, this would explain why Matthew and Luke contains differing details. For example, Matthew tells of the Wise Men that came to visit Jesus in Matt.2:1-12 while Luke tells of shepherds that came to visit Jesus in Luke 2:8-20. Since Matthew is styled for a Jewish audience, perhaps it is considered more impactful and stunning that wise philosophers came to worship a child. On the other hand, …show more content…
So perhaps both parties did visit Jesus, but at different times. Luke 2:16 shows that the shepherds “came in a hurry and found their way to Mary and Joseph, and the baby as He lay in the manger.” In Matthew 2:11, it says “after coming into the house they saw the Child with Mary His mother; and they fell to the ground and worshiped Him.” These two passages show that the shepherds visited Jesus as a baby while the Magi visited Jesus as a child. The point of this example is show to that the differing stories in Matthew and Luke did happen, but the authors could have decided that one story was more important than the other. In the very end, the differences from the gospels doesn’t come from the issue that one account is true and the other is false, it may come from the fact that the authors may have omitted details that they thought weren’t essential to the …show more content…
Matthew characterizes Jesus as the prophesized Messiah that has finally arrived. Every time a significant event, Matthew highlights that these events fulfill a certain specific prophecy. One example is the revelation that the power of the Holy Spirit caused the Virgin Mary to conceive. Matthew 1:22-23 says, “All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet: “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel.” Later on, Matthew 2:18 quotes a prophecy in Jeremiah that foretold the Herod’s actions, and Matthew again quotes another prophecy in Matthew 2:15 where “the Lord had spoken by the prophet, ‘out of Egypt I called my son.’” This was when Joseph, Mary, and Jesus had fled to Egypt to avoid the wrath of Herod. Other important details that fulfilled prophecies are Joseph’s lineage of the House of David and Jesus’ childhood in Nazareth (which makes him a Nazarene). (Matt. 2:23) The very end picture that Matthew intends to portray is that Jesus fulfills so many specific prophecies in the Old Testament, that surely, without a doubt, Jesus was the Messiah the Jews were waiting
Luke’s gospel contains stories not found in the other gospels. In Luke’s gospel, the references to Mary are: 1:26-38, the Annunciation, 1:39-56, Mary visits her cousin Elizabeth,2:1-7, the birth of Mary’s son Jesus,2:21-38, Mary takes Jesus to the Temple,2:41-52, Mary and Joseph lose Jesus during a visit to Jerusalem,4:16-30, Jesus is rejected at Nazareth ,8:19-21, the family of Jesus visit him dur...
This fragment is taken from THE NEW TESTAMENT (King James version). More importantly, the fragment appears in THE GOSPAL ACCORDING TO ST. MATTHEW, which is the first gospel out of four. While there is no speaking character in the fragment, it is possible to witness several characters in it. First, there are the wise men who came to visit and see baby Jesus. Second, when they entered the house, they saw Jesus with “Mary, his mother.” In this fragment, one can notice the significance of the wise men (Magi). Seeing that, the wise men function as evidence to display Jesus’s godliness and his relation to God, by seeing him they “fell down, and worshiped him.” Due to God’s intervention in the wise men’s dreams, they have changed their actions, understanding
The authors of the Gospel According to Matthew, and the Gospel According to Luke made some considerable modifications, deletions, and additions to the Gospel of Mark. To the average reader the changes seem rather significant and one might ask why these changes were made. Well, there are several reasons why these changes were made. For example, the authors wanted to show readers that Jesus was more holy than the original author set him out to be. Also, the authors sought after to express the gospel in, what they thought, were better words to make it appear more authentic. Furthermore the authors of the Gospel According to Matthew and the Gospel According to Luke wanted simply to modify the text because they didn’t see eye to eye with what the original author said.
The beginning and ending of the Gospel of Mark really support the four main themes present within the Gospel. The four main themes in the Gospel are: Jesus as being enigmatic, Jesus as a sufferer, Low Christology and Apocalypticism present within the Gospel. The beginning and ending of this Gospel support Jesus as being misunderstood because in the beginning, there is no birth story of Jesus or any background information presented, Jesus is just there. This makes one question where did he come from and who was he born to? In the end of the Gospel, the tomb is described as empty and the last sentences of the Gospel in Mark 16: 8 says: “So they went out and fled from the tomb, for terror and amazement had seized them; and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid” (1743). This ending of the Gospel is enigmatic because there is no mention of Jesus’ resurrection or whether anyone ever found out that Jesus had ascended to Heaven. The beginning and ending, not to mention the entire Gospel, leaves one wondering many things about Jesus, because his whole existence in Mark is very mys...
The book of Matthew talks about Jesus walking on the water. There are a few ways that people explain the passage. Some people try to explain away the miracle. We are going to discuss both these ways.
Regarding fulfillment, the New Testament writers have identified Jesus Christ as the Messiah. They believed that the prophecies from the Hebrew Bible have been performed by Jesus and that He was sent by God. First of all, God told Abram in Genesis 12:3 that the world would be blessed through him. A Messianic prophecy was that the Messiah would be a descendent of Abraham, from the tribe of Judah, and also from King David. The genealogy of Jesus in Matthew 1:2-6 reveals that He descended from Abraham, Judah, and King David. Thus, the author of Matthew is asserting that according to Jesus’ forefathers, He qualifies as being the Messiah.
It is known to most that the gospels often differ from historical facts due to the writer of each gospel putting significant emphasis on particular actions and attributes of Jesus. Also a major part in this difference is the fact that the gospels were written 35-60 years after the death of Jesus and some of these memories have altered over time. Differences in conflicting evidence, writing to different communities, writing during a different time period, and with different intentions are all more reasons as to why these gospels conflict with historical facts. There is said to be six accounts that are subdivided into two separate traditions. These two traditions are those having to do with the appearance of Jesus in Galilee and the others are the appearances of Jesus to the eleven disciples in Jerusalem. These two traditions seem to not have any knowledge of one another and when the two were attempted to be combined into one tradition it was proven that this is not only impossible but it is unbeneficial.
The author of Mark gives the basic outline or the “essentials” of Jesus’ biography. Considering this and the fact that Mark was the first gospel written, it should come as no surprise that the gospels of Matthew and Luke borrow from and expand on Mark. However, this does not mean that one should only read Mark because the “essentials” are all that’s needed in order to be a follower of Christ. Matthew and Luke have important material that Mark does not include. They also narrate from different perspective and with a different purpose. On the other hand, it also does not mean that reading Luke and Matthew will reveal everything you need to know about Mark, Mark merely includes details and wording that Matthew and Luke do
The book of Luke is an extensive account of the life of Jesus, recording many more miracles than the other gospels including the genealogy of Jesus back to Adam and Jesus’ birth through His life, death, and resurrection. Luke is a marvelous storyteller who captures the life of the praying Jesus as the human Messiah in conflict with religious rulers, who came to free all humanity with His life and resurrection.
The book of Luke was said to have been written somewhere around the time of 60 A.D. the book was written to tell the story of Jesus life (Fairchild M. 2014). Luke was a historian and a medical doctor we learned this through (Colossians 4:14) (Fairchild M. 2014). He was very specific and used great detail when writing the Gospel of Luke; he recorded the events and their dates very precisely. It was said that Luke did allot of research and spoke with the disciples as well as other eyewitnesses to the life of Christ (Fairchild M. 2014).The only author that is known to the Gospel of Luke was Luke himself, Luke was of Greek heritage and we know that he was the only Gentile Christian author of the New Testament (Fairchild M. 2014).
People in Matthew’s gospel include (but are not limited to) Jesus, His parents Mary and Joseph, all of Jesus’ disciples, John the Baptist, and other instances of leaders. Some of the leaders include those that were in the government like Pontius Pilate and also religious leaders like the Pharisees that attempted to hinder the work of
Mark’s gospel and John’s gospel contain many differences from the beginning, but both end with Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection. The gospels of John and Mark represent Jesus as two different people. The disparity is that Mark represents Jesus as a servant while John portrays Jesus as a divine being. However, one must realize the two texts are meant to read by different audiences during different time periods. Each description presents a particular aspect of the life of Historical Jesus.
The Gospel of Luke presents a prayer that is commonly known as the Lord’s Prayer. In this prayer Jesus tells his disciples how to pray to his father. They asked him a question concerning the way in which they are superpose to pray to the Father. He replied with Lord’s Prayer which appears in different form from the more familiar version in Matthew. “It is not certain whether Jesus gave His disciples two visions of the prayer or early church adapted His original words in different ways to meet its needs.” However, the Gospel of Luke form is the shorter; it contains an address and two sets of petitions. 2. Father is the translation of the Aramaic Abba used by Jesus (cf. 10:21; Mk. 14:36); here, therefore, Jesus introduces His disciples to the same intimate relationship with God Himself. This prayer is significant in it gives a picture of how we should pray for one another and forgive our fellow brothers and sisters who has debited against us as we aspect God to do the same for us. The Lord’s Prayer is the most important prayer for all God’s children. This prayer is constructed by Jesus considering all our needs .This payer is a great formula for the development of the soul. Jesus designed this prayer with specific purpose so that those who use it or pray it regularly with all the understanding, will
In Matthew, Jesus performs miracles, shares parables, and teaches the way of God. The theme of Matthew 's Gospel gives evidence to Jesus as the Messiah, the son of Abraham, the one chosen by God to deliver the people from their sins (Matthew 1:1). Which places special emphasis on Jesus’ fulfillment of prophecies – the prophecy of “the Son of David’ (Matthew 12:23).
The four gospels are detailed accounts of the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. Each portrays a unique story and angle of Jesus, who is the savior of the Jews and the world. Apostle Matthew’s writings are to prove to the Jews that Jesus is their Messiah. Mark stressed the humanity of Jesus and also his deity. Luke wanted to show that the gentile Christian in God’s kingdom is based on the teachings of Jesus. John speaks of Jesus as one sent from God to reveal His love and grace to man. The four gospels work together to elaborate on the several key themes; salvation, spreading His word, and the fulfillment of Jesus’ promise.