Should Virtual Child Pornography Be Banned?

975 Words4 Pages
In today’s society, people are debating if “virtual” child pornography should be banned. Most people believe that it should, while others believe that it should not be banned at all. Since the Supreme Court decided that “virtual” child pornography is legal, most people have felt that they have made a horrible mistake. By check many articles on this topic, I have decided to use two fairly good articles, written by two well-known editors, Wendy Kaminer, editor at The Atlantic Monthly, and Paul Rodriguez, editor of Insight on the News. Even though I agree that “virtual” child pornography should be banned, Kaminer presented a stronger argument that “virtual” child pornography should not be banned.

The article, “Virtual Child Pornography Should Not Be Banned,” by Wendy Kaminer, argues that “virtual” child pornography should not be banned because no child is harm. Kaminer serves on the national board of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Kaminer claims since no “real” child is being harm in the production, it should not be banned.

Kaminer start her argument by saying that it is possible that “virtual” child pornography may encourage pedophiles to act on their impulses or may help them in seducing children, but there is no evidence proving that these images have that want effects. She relied her sources on stating what the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA)prohibited and what she believe they fail to realize and considered when making the Act of 1996. She also made points on how movies and ads are involved in “virtual” child pornography.

Kaminer argument was good, it was not that strong for me to think on it but she did point out good examples such as: how forty-year old mistake fifteen years old for young adults, which ...

... middle of paper ...

...e than emotions when supporting her argument. As one articles tried with evidence and the other with emotions to support their argument, they both lack stronger evidence and did not catch the reader attention that well. There are still more articles to examining on the subject but in the end, I felt Kaminer gave a stronger argument with more evidence and support then Rodriguez.

Works Cited
Rodriguez, Paul M. “Virtual Child Pornography Should Be Banned,” Understanding and

Engaging Humanity. Ed. Brad McAdon, Mary E. Williams, Auriana Ojeda, and Williams

Dudley. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press 2010, 203-208

Kaminer, Kaminer. “Virtual Child Pornography Should Not Be Banned,” Understanding and

Engaging Humanity. Ed. Brad McAdon, Mary E. Williams, Auriana Ojeda, and Williams

Dudley. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press 2010, 209-213

More about Should Virtual Child Pornography Be Banned?

Open Document