Should Government Have To Say In Our Diets Essay

514 Words2 Pages

The government should not have a say in our diet. It will go against the right of individual liberty, and several changes will occur in food companies, which will have an influence on millions of people. Its government policies will also bring various health changes to individuals, and unexpected consequences will occur. On top of that, there are countless examples of government involvement failing.
In much of the United States, the right to individual liberty is given. If the government intervenes, and has a say in our diets, then this right is denied. The citizens have a right to freedom of speech, and liberty. This includes their right to make their own decisions on what they should and should not consume.
Numerous government policies bring unintended consequences. For example, since the 1970’s, the Department of Agriculture dietary guidelines urged many citizens to eat low fat diets to decrease the risk of obesity and heart disease. Many Americans took the government’s advice and ate less fattening food. As a result, though, they consumed more food which means they took in more calories. This increase in the overall calories also meant an increase in the total amount of fat calories. They did this because they believed that they were eating healthy foods, so they could eat as much as they would like to. This was a misunderstanding caused by the …show more content…

For example, in 2007, we had similar obesity rates to Quebec. It’s government decided to step in and ban items and advertising for unhealthy foods. Canada has a comparable climate, population, region, and setting. If we are so similar and government involvement did not affect any of their obesity rates, then why should we expect a change? This will only waste money the government does not have. The government has not been able to stop crime, pregnancy in adolescents, underage drug use, and poverty, so how can we expect a change in our

Open Document