Should Assault Weapons Be Banned Essay

The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This means that citizens have a right to bear arms, but since this amendment is not very clear there is some controversy. Many people argue that there shouldn’t be assault weapons because they are too powerful, or that this amendment was not intended to allow high powered assault weapons. There are many reasons on why assault rifles and large magazines should not be banned in the United States, including protection, defense, and past bans have not been effective.

Assault weapons give citizens the feeling of protection. Citizens use assault weapons to protect themselves

They say more murders will be committed, but the gun rate is the highest it has ever been in 1991 and since then in 2012 murder rate has decreased to 49%, a 52% drop(Ten Reasons Why States Should Reject “Assault Rifle” and “Large” Magazine Bans). Statistics say that even though bans are put in place to reduce crime it doesn’t. In another article it states that California banned assault rifles in 1989 and the murder rate increased every year and over the course of five years it increased 26%. Two-thirds of the murders today committed with firearms, but of those two-thirds, 69% are committed with handguns not rifles(Banning ‘Assault Weapons’ Is Not the Answer).

There are many reasons on why assault rifles and large magazines should not be banned in the United States, including protection, defense, past bans have proved many things. Many people would say no to keeping assault rifles legal, but those are just a few of the reasons why we should say yes to keeping assault weapons legal. But statistics have showed that past bans do not work. Plus having assault weapons defense and protection for when they need it most. We should not ban assault