Sexual Offences Act 2003 Essay

560 Words2 Pages

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 amended the law on sexual offense by the merging of the common law and pre-existent statute. It had also eradicated some of the previously held criminal offenses which were popular in the 19th century and thus offering protection and prevention from crimes that were committed in that period. The sole purpose of introducing the Sexual Offences Act 2003 was to adapt with the current era and therefore offer protection and prevention of crimes that didn’t exist before but do now, thus, revoking most of the Sexual Offences Acts 1956 and 1967and the Indecency with Children Act 1960 and inventing a new law on rape and sexual assault as well as a host of other new offences which included offences that are committed against vulnerable people. The Sexual Offences Act focuses mainly on consent and that consent must be proven in the following offences: assault by penetration, causing a person(s) to engage in sexual activity, sexual assault and rape. The three central provisions in the Sexual Offences Act 2003 which are applied to the offences listed above are as follows: a general definition of consent, rebuttal presumptions, where the defendant is expected to provide counter evidence that consent has …show more content…

One consents in the event that they agree by choice and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice. This originates from s.74 of Sexual Offences Act 2003 where ‘consent’ is defined using two ideas which are as follows: ‘agree by choice’ and ‘freedom and capacity’. ‘Agree by choice’ demonstrating that consent should be perceived as signs of willingness. Followed by this is a pair of factors which should be considered when deciding whether or not the consent from victim’s perspective can be perceived as legally effective; ‘freedom’ and

More about Sexual Offences Act 2003 Essay

Open Document