Sexism In Space

1418 Words3 Pages

Though often labelled as the “Final Frontier” the prospect of colonizing and living in space may not be as far-fetched as it once seemed. Modern technology and innovation may soon make it so that we can venture where “no one has gone before.” However, the prospect of colonization in space brings up several concerns. Would our social order be able to carry on in such a foreign environment? And if so, would culturally ingrained ideas such as sexism as a result of widely held notions of specific gender roles, etc. endure within our new colonies and future space missions? Considering the lack of female representation within US and international space programs throughout history as well as presently, and continuing discourses and practices within …show more content…

Following the initial shutdown of Project Mercury involving the women, several NASA representatives, including George Low and astronauts John Glenn and Scott Carpenter, testified that under NASA's selection criteria that women could not qualify as astronaut candidates. Glenn once stated that "the fact that women are not in this field is a fact of our social order" (Ackman, pg. 166), simply implying that many could not accept women in the “masculine” role of astronaut (Weitkamp, pg. 3) While they had correctly stated that NASA required all astronauts to be graduates of military jet test piloting programs and possess engineering degrees, John Glenn himself admitted that he had been assigned to NASA's Mercury Project without having earned the required degree (Ackman). Despite the fact that several of the women involved in the project had been employed as civilian test pilots, and many had considerably more propeller aircraft flying time than the male astronaut candidates, NASA still refused to grant equivalency for their experience. These refusals implicitly promoted postwar beliefs about men and women’s gender roles. Furthermore, flying a member of the “weaker sex” evoked stereotypes that if a woman could complete the complex tasks expected of astronauts, then it must be easy, and thereby ruined the “prestige” of the male astronauts (Weitkamp) much to …show more content…

For instance, a NASA informant claimed that “women and men have different brains” and “think differently (Casper, Moore, pg. 318). Females are viewed as “unstable entities”, promoting this rather erroneous assumption that men are more stable. Female astronauts thus gave multiple pressures operating on them at all times, simply because their bodies differ from the “male standard”. They are believed to introduce some degree of uncertainty into an otherwise “stable” environment, and as such their bodies are constructed to fit in in order to maintain this homeostasis. Harry Jones, a scientist of NASA Ames Research Center has stated that often times “size, body type, gender, emotional structure, and other individual differences might all affect the cost-benefit equation in astronaut selection” involving women (Greene), though NASA often claims there is no presence of gender bias in the selection process, and any issues when selecting a crew of astronauts concern crew performance involving such aspects as group dynamics and individual psychology. Concerning group dynamics, multi-gendered crews with a balanced number of men and women are considered more harmonious, with higher and more efficient performance members (Casper, Moore, pg. 318). And yet, if balance is better, why is it that there is only one or two women among the average seven members involved in

Open Document