Sequiturgical Analysis Hamlet

707 Words2 Pages

The teaching of this work is the perfect existence of the man who lives in the world of ideas and tragedy that originate the individuals who value the phenomenon. Men like Hamlet have not been portrayed too often in art but, above all, they have never been understood. The more man's thinking evolves and becomes more rational, the more incomprehensible this figure becomes and science calls this melancholy character, showing a complete incomprehension of its origin. This denomination is a simple description made by men who value the action and do not conceive another world than the empirical one. The proper denomination would be idealistic, supreme aspiration of all religion, whose type is only admired when presented as a Buddhist monk who has …show more content…

Analysis of the work

Hamlet's conflict is that, on the one hand, he wants to maintain his integrity but, on the other hand, he knows that he must punish injustice, which would force him to manifest himself as a phenomenon.

The temptation of Hamlet's suicide is also another literary figure with which to express the feeling of the protagonist. Hamlet knows that he must punish the death of his father but he knows that to act means to put an end to the sensitive nature of his nature, that is why, at first, he refrains from acting, as if he was not yet sufficiently prepared to take that step although In fact, what the author does is to present the ideas of the protagonist to the public as a reference to understand the situations that occur in the work and the principles that guide their actions.

The feigned madness of Hamlet means an approach of the protagonist to the empirical world, a demented world from the point of view of the ideal world from which existence without an essence is conceived as something without meaning. Hamlet delves into this world of nonsense to obtain evidence of his hunches although he knows that the search for certain data entails demeaning the world of one's …show more content…

Hamlet opens the door of the empirical world and succumbs before him. The death of Hamlet is symbolic, what has died is idealism so that his death could only be the result of anecdotal events, that is, of an error, according to the point of view of the actor, or of daily events, considered from the point of view of the future of humanity. If Hamlet had died as a result of justified revenge, the symbolic character of his demise would have been lost. But it could not have been the consequence of a fortuitous event, the chance of showing knowledge about existence would have been lost. His death had to be explained as a consequence of previous events and known but unsuspected consequences. Although his death is, at the same time, it is a suicide since Hamlet knew the result of his action although not the way in which it would be realized nor the cause that would cause

Open Document