Sebastian Junger Tribe Summary

931 Words2 Pages

In his book Tribe, Sebastian Junger, a journalist, tries to persuade the readers that our current society is no longer moving toward a common goal, which is making society more individualistic and in turn creating an undesirable lifestyle. Junger uses different communities throughout generations, such as Native American life in the 1760s and the Eastern Londoners during WWII, to solidify the argument that modern society’s individualistic mindset is not what is best for the common good. Junger later tries to further this argument by saying that after war, veterans with PTSD and veterans in general, long for the war they were in because upon return, they no longer feel a part of the self-preservative way of life that modern society holds. However, Junger gets lost in his argument by misrepresenting both the community of veterans and …show more content…

Within the first few pages, Junger uses the Iroquois tribe as an antithesis to returning soldiers by showing their way of life compared to modern society’s. Junger paints the picture of the Iroquois tribe during was as one whose “sole concern was the physical survival of tribe” (Junger 78). Meaning the Iroquois tribe were not only fighting for their land but also on their land, making it easier to resume back normal life because switching from peacetimes and war were mostly intertwined (Junger 78). Unlike most wars now, since “modern society often fight wars far away from the civilian population…” (Junger 78), Junger argues that “soldiers wind up being the only people who have to switch back and forth” (Junger 78). From there, he builds his argument that “given the profound alienation of modern society… combat vets say that they miss war” (Junger 78). However, the counterexample can be made that it is not alienation of modern society after war, but rather instances that pushed soldiers into war in the first

Open Document