Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criminal justice system in scotland uk essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criminal justice system in scotland uk essay
In Scotland, criminal justice is a devolved power from the parliament of the United Kingdom
to the Scottish parliament. Because of this Scotland has its own, both, civil and criminal
justice system of trial, which differs from the English and welsh systems. These divisions are
the two main categories that Scots law is split into. Despite both justice systems belonging to
Scotland, they have many differences in the way they operate, alongside these differences
there are also many similarities that should be noted.
A criminal offence is an offence committed by an individual/group that violates a law, and
most commonly is against the state or causes harm to a member of the public. If an
individual is caught committing a criminal
…show more content…
For more serious
crimes, however, the prosecutor Fiscal may visit the crime scene and have a more active
involvement in the investigation. If it is decided that a prosecution is needed, the case will be
taken forward to court for trial.
When concerning the civil justice system of trial, most trials are cases in which a party are
seeking to find an impartial solution over a dispute that has taken place. The civil justice
system is focused around said party having the ability to sue another for their negligence,
carelessness or their failure to provide safety. In short, the civil justice system allows one
party to sue another for money and receive care for their injuries. If an individual decides
that they want to take the dispute to court and sue the other, they need to present themselves
and evidence before a judge. If the judge decides that the party is responsible for the incident,
they must pay money to the other.
When examining both systems of justice, there are many similarities and differences in
…show more content…
Thus, while both systems are in place to help ensure justice, they deal with
different types of cases.
Another difference the systems have is who initiates the legal process. The process of
criminal justice is most often started by the police force when they obtain a criminal. This
then starts the legal process; the individual is charged and it is decided by the prosecutor
fiscal if they will be prosecuted. Contrastingly, the civil legal system is initiated by the
individual/company who wants the case to go to court. They must firstly present the case to a
judge who will then make the final decisions on the conclusion of the case. Additionally,
while in criminal trials it is the responsibility of the police force to find evidence to secure a
prosecution, in civil trials it is the responsibility of the individual taking the case to court.
Thus, showing some of the many differences between the Scottish criminal justice system of
trial and the civil justice system of trial.
Despite these differences, the two systems also share many similarities. For example, both
systems result in court and they are presented before a judge. Both systems result in
Gradually, however, justice was established by scientific law. The private, scientific law courts had no government force at their disposal. The Sheriff served the due process of the law. He was not a law-enforcer. The scientific law courts were private courts that were supported by the fees charged to litigants.
They weigh the evidence and apply the law. In the court system, criminal law is interpreted by a jury who are seen as expressing the sense of justice of ordinary men and women. Juries date back to the Middle Ages in England, and while membership, role, and importance have changed throughout the ages, they were part of the system of England’s Common Law. The purpose of the jury system was to ensure the civil rights of the ordinary citizen. It is important to remember that at the time, ordinary people had few rights.
The developments in penal reform and policies in Scotland have grown with the creation of modern Scotland. Devolution fundamentally changed the nature of criminal justice in Scotland, and the research as shown that increased political involvement and the need for has changed the penal policies over the past few decades. Pre-devolution it was clear that policy-making was carried out in partnership between civil servants and agencies with a rate of change, but the introduction of devolution propelled policy-making into an unstable and heavily politicised environment, which was never the case before, where it now answers to political expediency and the political cycle and this forced the Scottish Criminal Justice Service to take shape become what it is today to deal with the new crime and punishment issues that were revolutionizing over time.
Question two: What is the difference between To begin with, criminal justice is a system that is designed to maintain social control, which means it is a necessary aspect of every society since “Laws are the conditions under which independent and isolated men are united to form a society” (Beccaria, 1764: 16). In other words, crime control deals with the methods that are taken by a society to reduce its crime. As a matter of fact, there are various crime control strategies, from community policing to risk assessments. In addition to the different tactics for controlling crime, there are several theories that not only attempt to explain the causes of crime, but also outline different ways to handle offenders; for example, deterrence, rehabilitation, and even retribution. Now, it is important to realize that there is no perfect model for crime control, since there are advantages and disadvantages to every system.
Throughout the years there has been limitless legal cases presented to the court systems. All cases are not the same. Some cases vary from decisions that are made by a single judge, while other cases decisions are made by a jury. As cases are presented they typically start off as disputes, misunderstandings, or failure to comply among other things. It is possible to settle some cases outside of the courts, but that does require understanding and cooperation by all parties involved. However, for those that are not so willing to settle out of court, they eventually visit the court system. The court system is not in existence to cause humiliation for anyone, but more so to offer a helping hand from a legal prospective. At the same time, the legal system is not to be abuse. or misused either.
There are many actors in the criminal justice system such as prosecutors, judges, and defense lawyers. They present their case to a jury who will eventually decide if the defendant is found guilty or innocence. During trial the prosecutor and defense lawyer both present their case. All of this can be a lengthy process which also takes up time and cost money. In many cases prosecutors will offer a defendant a plea deals.
The symbol of the Canadian judicial system is the balanced scales of justice. When a wrongful act is committed, the scales of justice are greatly misplaced and require a solution to counterbalance the crime and restore balance. Additionally, the scales represent the idea that law should be viewed objectively and the determination of innocence should be made without bias. The Canadian criminal justice system encapsulates the idea of the scale of justice, to control crime and impose penalties on those who violate the law. One of the most important aspects of this system is that an individual charged with a criminal offence is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The current system has two prevailing methods involved in the process of dealing with crime: Retributive and restorative justice. This paper will analyze aspects of retributive justice and restorative justice, with reference to their respective philosophies, for the purpose of finding which is more effective at achieving justice and maintaining balance.
The second component of the criminal justice system is the court system. They court system is composed of lawyers, judges, and juries. Their job is to insure that everyone receives a fair trial, determine guilt or innocence, and apply sentences on guilty parties. The court system will contain one judge, and a jury of twelve citizens. The jury of the court will determine the guilt or innocence of the individual. The jury will also recommend a sentence for the crime the individual committed. Even though the jury makes the recommendation for the sentencing of the crime, the judge will follow pre-determined sentencing guidelines to make a final decision.
The criminal justice system is made up of many components that are constructed to ensure justice for victims of crimes, along with criminals. It is designed to guarantee that punishing those who are guilty will protect the innocent. Within the criminal justice system, there is a document that consists of all the jurisdictions of criminal law. This document is called the criminal code and entitles the offences that are acknowledged in the jurisdiction along with consequences that are enforced for these crimes. Throughout the years, there are offences constantly being added to the Criminal Code of Canada and many proposals being made by the Law Reform Commission of Canada.
The proceedings, in which a resolution is made, are entirely different between the two. At a criminal justice proceeding, the case is tried by a state prosecutor, in front of a judge and decided by a jury. Other than testifying and possibly a victim impact statement, the victim does not have much say in the case. But in a community justice proceeding it is quite the opposite. All parties involved (which include the offender, the victim, both families, any other p...
Crime is some action/omission that causes harm in a situation that the person/group responsible ‘ought’ to be held accountable and punished irrespective of what the law book of state say.
Both systems have also been advanced in its own historical setting. Above all the system makes sure that the innocent does not suffer in the name of justice, as the system
their jobs for the public at large, not for you personally. In a criminal case, the Crown prosecutor must prove the defendant’s. guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt. " This means that at the end of a trial.... ...
The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any disputes against them rise. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. In the Criminal court is the luxury of going through a tedious process of breaking a law. Once you have been arrested and have to go to court because of the arrest, you now have a criminal case appointed against you. The court is also the place where a just, fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute. The parties are given a chance to represent themselves or to choose to have a legal representative, which is mostly preferred by many.
Every nation has their own set of legal strategies they use to guide them in making important decisions. Each nation has its traditions and policies they follow. Through the world, there are two main types of legal systems that are used; most nations follow either common or civil law. Both the common law system and the civil law system share similarities in having courts, judges, and comparing cases to laws. While both systems share similarities, they also contain many differences, making them two very divergent legal systems.