Schopenhauer Lord Of The Flies Beast Analysis

891 Words2 Pages

William Golding agrees with the fact that the thing which makes men monsters is something which exists inside all men. He shows this when Simon falls asleep and has a conversation with the beast that the boys are afraid of throughout the book. When Simon is asleep and sees this beast, the beast says to Simon “Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill… You knew didn’t you? I’m part of you” (Golding 143). The beast tells Simon that all of their previous attempts to hunt down the beast, which they were all so terrified of, were in vain for it is not some corporeal thing that can be hunted and killed but instead that it is a part of the boys. The text also shows that this beast is what causes the boys to act so viciously when the beast then continues on to tell Simon that he is soon going to have some fun with him. The next thing that happens to Simon after this encounter he has …show more content…

Schopenhauer explains how “we then feel that every fulfilment of our wishes won from the world is only like the alms that keep the beggar alive today so that he may starve again tomorrow” (Schopenhauer 390). The issue with the Will is the fact that when one attempts to satiate his desire, that feeling of desire is only ever replaced with even more. The Will is almost like the Hydra in that whenever one desire is fulfilled it is almost as if two more take its place to the point where the person is completely overcome by desire and the Will takes over. This takeover by the Will is what leads to one reaching a place of such vice due to the fact the Will has no internal framework which limits its driving force to virtuous actions. Therefore, as a necessary result, when desires which are not vicious are no longer enough, there exists nothing which could serve to curb the Will away from moving towards much more vicious

Open Document