School Board Meeting Reflection

964 Words2 Pages

I attended the District 87 School Board meeting on October 14th, 2015. The members that were present were board members James Almeda, Tammy Houtzel, Jennifer Sedbrook, Judith Webster, Mark Wylie, Mary Yount, and John Dirks, the Board President. The members present from the administrative staff were Dr. Herschel Hannah, Cindy Helmers, David Wood, and Dr. Barry Reilley, the District 87 Superintendent. Only one member of the board were people of color. There were little to no community members at the meeting. As a result, it can be concluded that the community interaction for this meeting was largely inert. All who attended the meeting were there for a specific purpose, such as giving a presentation, announcing the audit, and serving as a student …show more content…

The members of the board detailed school-sponsored events that they have attended since the board last met and applauded other members of the board for their work in such programs. The audit for the 2014-2015 school year was discussed in full detail and a group of teachers presented a program designed to help low-achieving students reach their full potential. Lastly, the board discussed the approval of the Human Resources Report, bills, the FOIA Report, Payroll, Food Service Agreement with Boy’s and Girl’s Club, and the BHS Dance Team Trip. All of these were unanimously approved. I believe that the agenda was appropriate for the items that needed to be addressed. The meeting was conducted in a timely manner through the items that needed to be discussed were …show more content…

This type of unanimous voting is also synonymous with an inert school board. These members, based on their actions, seem to take on the “delegate” role. None of the members came across as politically minded or individually minded. All members seemed to act in favor of the public’s interest. Dr. Reilly, the district Superintendent, can be seen the same way. He acted as a delegate; he was very respectful of his board members and listened to their concerns. Dr. Reilly knew that he was not the sole voice during the meeting and allowed others to voice their opinions. He did not act as a politico and only share information with certain board members to insure that the board voted according to his agenda. He as did not seem to believe that he “knows what is best for the district" as is expected as a

Open Document