Schedule Of Reinforcement With Skinner Summary

936 Words2 Pages

Ferseter (2002). Schedules of Reinforcement with Skinner, Journal of the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 77, 303-311.
Summary
This article discusses Ferseter’s personal experience working with Skinner on the pigeon experiments. C. B. Ferseter states how he got involved with the experiment and what he learned from working with Skinner. The pigeon lab looked at schedules of reinforcement and the analysis of behavior. This article is more of a personal paper looking at Ferseter’s personal thoughts and experience on the experiments than a scientific journal. This gave readers more context and information on the pigeon lab and Skinner. This article also gave insight to how Skinner interacted with the other researchers and how they worked with …show more content…

B. Ferseter was affective at giving his readers insight on working with Skinner. His personal experience made the reading easy to read and it also made it more interesting. Academic articles can often be boring and filled with complicated phrases and words. This article was simple and affective at giving readers information on an important experiment. Ferseter also gives explanations and extra details that Skinner may have left out in his reports. He gives details about how the team interacted with each other and how there was a lack of personal support. I enjoyed how Ferseter stated that Skinner may not have been aware of the lack of personal support, but most of the team was. Ferseter was reinforced naturally but many of his peers needed personally support. I find it interesting that the experiments were about reinforcement but Skinner neglected to positively reinforce his …show more content…

F. Skinner prompted me to write in 1958: ‘‘A potential reinforcing environment exists for every individual, however, if he will only emit the required performances on the proper occasions.”
I like this quote because I feel like it can be applied to every day occasions. You must put in the work to have a preferred outcome. I also like how the author relates this to his experience in the pigeon lab. For example, you must study on the proper occasions and do what is required of you to pass a class. The environment and outcomes can reinforce behaviors.
“There is a fear of the unknown in research just as there is a fear of dealing with new people. We approach a new problem or a new person with a repertoire that comes from our past experience.”
I found this quote interesting because I feel that almost everyone of us can relate to the fear of dealing with new people. I have done very little research in my life, so I like how Ferseter mentions a more relatable fear. Humans fear the unknown. I feel like this quote made me feel like the researchers were all human. When reading academic articles, I often forget that researchers are actual people with fears and that they don’t have the answer for everything. I also like how he mentions how past experiences shape how we approach the unknown. Our past experiences are so important because they create and shape our

Open Document