Sam Richards Rhetorical Analysis

789 Words2 Pages

Social Psychology and examining empathy. Steadily watching the Sam Richards: A radical experiment in empathy where he explain his reasoning on empathy in the Middle East. He starts by doing an analogy; what if a hundred years ago China had been the most powerful nation in the world and they came to the United States in search of coal, and they found it, and, in fact, they found lots of it right here. And pretty soon, they began shipping that coal, ton by ton, rail car by rail car, boatload by boatload, back to China and elsewhere around the world. And they got fabulously wealthy in doing so. And they built beautiful cities all powered on that coal. And back here in the United States, we saw economic despair, deprivation. (Smith, 2010)
He used …show more content…

He used a photograph also to put ourselves in the shoes, as if we had a United States coals rising with China. He made the audience feel the anger and the rage that the Middle Eastern felt to defend their country, if we step into their shoes and look at the sociology analysis of this situation. If we put ourselves outside the box, and look at another concept of looking at the world differently and understanding empathy in a different way. Sam is not saying to agree with the terrorist, but to empathize, as if we were in the identical shoes. What if we had a crusade that tried to destroy our way of living and our meaning of life? If we Americans had to live in the despair in a poor country and looking at what media showing the Middle East. Like we are all rich with blue eyes and blond hair, which is not the case at all. He uses this approach the make a statement and to differ groupthink, which is a pattern of thinking that renders groups members unable to evaluate realistically the wisdom of various options and decisions. (Bernstein A. Douglas, 2014) It make you wonder, why the Arabs teach their kids, exactly how we teach the Marine Core. It’s because of Americans first impressions that, says we are Christians but therefore we will kill just for a material called liquid goal, which is oil. We try to use attribution to explain the thinking of Middle Eastern people, but the thing is we cannot determine that because

Open Document