Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Islamic extremism in middle east essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Islamic extremism in middle east essay
Social Psychology and examining empathy. Steadily watching the Sam Richards: A radical experiment in empathy where he explain his reasoning on empathy in the Middle East. He starts by doing an analogy; what if a hundred years ago China had been the most powerful nation in the world and they came to the United States in search of coal, and they found it, and, in fact, they found lots of it right here. And pretty soon, they began shipping that coal, ton by ton, rail car by rail car, boatload by boatload, back to China and elsewhere around the world. And they got fabulously wealthy in doing so. And they built beautiful cities all powered on that coal. And back here in the United States, we saw economic despair, deprivation. (Smith, 2010)
He used
…show more content…
He used a photograph also to put ourselves in the shoes, as if we had a United States coals rising with China. He made the audience feel the anger and the rage that the Middle Eastern felt to defend their country, if we step into their shoes and look at the sociology analysis of this situation. If we put ourselves outside the box, and look at another concept of looking at the world differently and understanding empathy in a different way. Sam is not saying to agree with the terrorist, but to empathize, as if we were in the identical shoes. What if we had a crusade that tried to destroy our way of living and our meaning of life? If we Americans had to live in the despair in a poor country and looking at what media showing the Middle East. Like we are all rich with blue eyes and blond hair, which is not the case at all. He uses this approach the make a statement and to differ groupthink, which is a pattern of thinking that renders groups members unable to evaluate realistically the wisdom of various options and decisions. (Bernstein A. Douglas, 2014) It make you wonder, why the Arabs teach their kids, exactly how we teach the Marine Core. It’s because of Americans first impressions that, says we are Christians but therefore we will kill just for a material called liquid goal, which is oil. We try to use attribution to explain the thinking of Middle Eastern people, but the thing is we cannot determine that because
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
Steve Sheinkin, award-winning author, in his novel Bomb: The Race to Build- and Steal- the World’s Most Dangerous Weapon (2012) addresses the topic of nuclear war and proves that no matter what actions are taken (during war) there will be negative outcomes by depicting the characters with anxiety, describing horror-filled battle scenes and revealing the thirst for power during these times. Sheinkin supports his claim by using memorable moments in the novel such as when the bomb is dropped on Hiroshima and the entire city is close to being wiped out; also when Stalin is upset that the Americans completed the atomic bomb which leads to another race of building upwards
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
In the prompt Peter Singer expresses his belief that if a person has excess money they should be donating whatever is not used for necessities to charity, so the extra money can be taken overseas and used in aiding other countries. In this he is excessive, as we work hard for our money and should not be forced to do anything with it , however also has a point in charity work will help our world become a better place.
War can not be fully described in just words, humans have to experience it to know how it really is. In passage 1 from “The Things They Carried”, a fictional memoir by Tim O'brien, the narrator describes the contradictory nature of war. O’brien uses rhetorical strategies to characterize the experience of war. O’brien uses imagery, anaphora, and paradox to guide readers understand the experience of war through fictional writing.
Peter Singer is an Australian ethical and political philosopher, best known for his work in bioethics. He argues that our ordinary patterns of spending money on ourselves are immortal. He thinks that spending money on things that benefit us rather than others, are not essential to preserving our lives or health. He believes that we should give most of our hard earned money to the poor or homeless. Singer states, “The money we spend on fancy dinners, new clothes, or vacations could instead be sent to relief agencies that save people’s lives.” Singer offers three cases where people have the opportunity to prevent an innocent person’s death, but fail to do so. The person in each of these examples has done something extremely immoral or wrong.
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
Charles Lamb masterfully shoots down a request from his good friend William Wordsworth by using many forms of rhetorical strategies, including multiple uses of imagery, LEP, and rhetorical questions, delivering all of it in a slowly degrading form of sincerity to decline Wordsworth’s invitation to visit him in the country.
According to Arianna Huffington in the article “Empathy: What We Need Now”, during hardships and instability of society, empathy is needed to find solutions to those issues. Huffington writes about how empathy is needed in our country in order to produce a positive social change. She begins by giving an example of a movement that Martin Luther King created and how empathy was a part of this movement. King as well spoke of how empathy is the sign of living. To become involved in the situations of humanity in order to improve it, displays that empathy is the core of a human’s existence. After reading this article, I do agree with Huffington about how individuals need to fully understand and put themselves within the situation to fully comprehend the issue to solve.
Celebrities are often used to endorse products for businesses to increase profits. Sue Jozui in her passage, explains that she believes using celebrities in advertisements is insulting to the buyer, and this action should be boycotted. The author supports her argument by first defining what using celebrities does to the consumer and how it portrays the consumer to be. She continues by stating that legislative rules should be enforced. The authors purpose is to convince the government and businesses to stop this action so that people aren't being persuaded to buy products just because a celebrity is advertising it. The author establishes a serious tone for all consumers that also support her claim. Jozui’s allegations of celebrities endorsing
Burton defines empathy as the ability to not only recognize but also to share another person’s or a fictional character’s or a sentient beings’ emotions. It involves seeing a person’s situation from his or her own perspective and then sharing his or her emotions and distress (1). Chismar posits that to empathize is basically to respond to another person’ perceived state of emotion by experiencing similar feelings. Empathy, therefore, implies sharing another person’s feeling without necessary showing any affection or desire to help. For one to empathize, he or she must at least care for, be interested in or concerned about
Empathy is imperative to teach kids from a young age in order to help them recognize mental states, such as thoughts and emotions, in themselves and others. Vital lessons, such as walking in another’s shoes or looking at a situation in their perspective, apprehends the significance of the feelings of another. Our point of view must continuously be altered, recognizing the emotions and background of the individual. We must not focus all of our attention on our self-interest. In the excerpt, Empathy, written by Stephen Dunn, we analyze the process of determining the sentiment of someone.
In his essay entitled “The Rhetorical Stance,” Wayne Booth describes how rhetorical stance is imperative for good writing. I agree with Booth that by using rhetoric stance in our writing we can produce and powerful and well-written argument. How then do we know if we are using the art of rhetoric in our writing? According to Booth, “Rhetoric is the art of finding and employing the most effective means of persuasion on any subject, considered independently of intellectual mastery of that subject" (199). In making this comment Booth urges us to be knowledgeable on the subject we are writing about and use passion and emotional appeals to strengthen our argument. Booth gives his readers a good explanation of what the word means and how it is portrayed in essays.