Ruby Tuesday Job Analysis

695 Words2 Pages

I began working at Ruby Tuesdays, as a server, in August of 2014. At Ruby Tuesday, there are three managers in total, one general manager, Caty, and two assistant managers, Damar and Jimmy. Initially, I had the best coworkers and managers anyone could have hoped for at a new job. All three of my managers were friendly, dependable, and down-to-earth. My co-workers and I referred to them as the “dream-team”. They were not your typical managers. They understood our frustrations inside and outside of work. They wanted to be good leaders, but also our friends. They strived to create an environment where we still got what we needed to do, done, but it was fun and laid-back. My co-workers and I enjoyed our jobs and loved coming to work. Unfortunately, my manager “dream-team” was broken up. One of the assistant managers, Jimmy was transferred to another restaurant and in his place, our restaurant got a new assistant manager, Sky. …show more content…

A prototype defines the clearest or most representative example of some category, for me a manager. My other managers, Caty, Damar and Jimmy, set that prototype. Personable, laid-back, and supporting were the traits I was looking for in a new manager. Instead, I got reserved, strict, and someone who pushed me. I believe this was one of my main errors of perception when it came to Sky; he did not fit my prototype. Not only did he not fit my prototype, but he also did not fit my personal construct. A personal construct is a “mental yardstick” we use to measure a person or situation. I used my personal construct to judge Sky right out of the gate. He was not the archetype of approachable, considerate, or reassuring to me. I think I was partially thrown off by how much he did not measure up to my personal constructs. However, I learned that just because he does not fit my personal constructs does not mean that he is a terrible person, but that he possesses different qualities than I am used

Open Document