Rosie The Riveter Analysis

1819 Words4 Pages

This historiographical study will define the romantic notions of Rosie the Riveter in an analysis of differing gender ideologies in the writings of Emily Yell, Maureen Honey, and D’Ann Campbell. Campbell’s (1984) analysis of the women’s war effort is defined by the way in which women rejected the patriarchal institutions that forced them to serve. Certainly, this historiographical interpretation defines the way in which some women chose to fight against the U.S. government as an institution that curtailed their freedoms. Campbell 91984) defines the conflicting role of women’s rights during WWII, which created gender tensions between men and women on the homeland. Emily Yellin's (2004) historical perspective provides a non-feminist style of historiography, since she does not focus on the gender-breaking role of the “Roses” that worked in the factories, This book defines the traditional roles of “mothers” and wives” that served as nurses in the Red Cross and other organizations during the war as a part of a sacrifice for the “fathers” and “husbands” that fought and died in the war. Finally, Honey’s (1985) evaluation of wartime media propaganda illustrates the double-standard of “Rosie the Riveter” and the underlying motives of a patriarchal government that utilized them as temporary workers during this historical period. In essence, a …show more content…

These double-standards define the overarching patriarchal construct of media propaganda, which was altered to suit the needs of a wartime economy that did not have men to work in these factories. Along with stories that emboldened women to join the war effort, True Story also published “confessional’ stories that victimized women in the very same

Open Document