Romeo And Juliet And Much Ado About Nothing Comparative Essay

724 Words2 Pages

Shakespeare’s classics Much Ado About Nothing and Romeo and Juliet are both tales of love and misfortune. More so one than the other, but there are still dissatisfying situations in the more light-hearted one. There are various similarities and differences in both plays, throughout the beginning, middle, and end. Firstly, at the start of each story, we immediately see how different the plays will be--Romeo and Juliet begins with a sorrow-filled outcome of what has just occurred, and Much Ado About Nothing starts with celebration and happiness for what is to come. These commencements provide a base for each story, to show what they will turn out to be. As we progress a little further into the plays, we begin to see how the characters interact with each other. In Romeo and Juliet, …show more content…

It really shows how loyal the friends seem to be to each other. Consequently, this causes even more trouble, as Romeo becomes relentless due to the slaughter of his best friend. He kills Tybalt in a duel, following the last. Overall, the seriousness and impact of everyone’s actions lead up to the devastating end of Romeo and Juliet. In contrast, Much Ado About Nothing exhibits much more of a light and airy plot. The characters are all respectful and pleasant to each other for the most part, except for the distinctly evil Don John and his underlings, and Beatrice and Benedick’s battles of wit. In the midst of the story, everyone is presented as trying to improve everyone else’s life. Claudio, Leonato, and Don Pedro are trying to get Benedick to fall in love with Beatrice. Hero and Ursula, parallel to the men, are fooling Beatrice into loving Benedick. There is a masked party, like in Romeo and Juliet, but this one doesn’t involve a secretive, forbidden love. It is more of a happy party, surrounded and intertwined with all sorts of joy. There is even a proposal, which I believe makes it quite an

Open Document