Robert Drews The End Of The Bronze Age

1607 Words4 Pages

The end of the Bronze Age in the eastern Mediterranean saw great change. The transition to the Iron Age saw “the development and spread of alphabetic writing, the growth of nationalism, of republican political forms, of monotheism, and eventually of rationalism” (3). The improvements were grand, as negatives also came, but what exactly led to this ending of an era in this region? Historian and Vanderbilt professor Robert Drews, who specializes in ancient history and prehistory, states his main reason being changes in warfare strategies—mainly the transition away from chariot-based warfare. The professor goes on in his thesis to dispute five other possible explanations for the Collapse in his book The End of the Bronze Age. But how right is …show more content…

The historian goes on to discredit many of these proposals. The author starts with the belief that ironworking caused the Collapse. However, Drews states this is not true since iron would not be used until after the Catastrophe. Even then, the iron use was very gradual (75). “The ironworking hypothesis has been undone by archaeological excavations and by metallurgical analyses. Although in conventional terminology the ‘Iron Age’ commenced with the Catastrophe, it is now quite clear that iron did not come into regular use until well over a century after the Catastrophe ended” (75). Another possible reason, the Vanderbilt professor discredits is earthquakes. Drews discusses many regions that the “damage from earthquakes that is certain” (37). However, the natural disaster would not explain the sacking and or complete destruction of some areas such as in Egypt (38-39). As the author states, “Damage is one thing, however, and destruction is another. Only a very few cities are known to have been [fully] destroyed by an ‘act of God” (38). Thus, this belief is only partially correct. Also with natural disasters, Drews discusses drought. He states there may been droughts, but directly prior to the Catastrophe “women and children were receiving, on average, 128 percent of their daily caloric requirement” (81). Some shortages did happen and may have been due to Raiders who pillaged. Raiders themselves are another hypothesis Drews discredits. Many argue Raiders were simply a result of the Catastrophe, but the fighting style they employed and them sacking areas show they were instead are a part

Open Document