Analysing Australia's Violent Colonization: A Historical Perspective

618 Words2 Pages

Historical accounts have often overlooked the more violent aspects of Australia’s colonisation (Watson 2002, p. 6). This approach to Australian historiography presents a whitewashed view of the past. Within this essay, is a critical analysis and comparison of two representations of the frontier conflicts of Australia. The historical texts reviewed in this paper, Through Their Eyes (Lakic & Wrench 1994) and Rivers of Blood (Medcalf 1995), examine darker elements of Australia’s history and recognise the experiences of Indigenous people. They belong to a modern historiography that extends beyond the proud, patriotic and pleasantly sanitised view of Australia’s dominant culture to explore how the events of Australia’s colonisation impacted people’s …show more content…

However, although frontier conflict was widespread it the violent history of colonisation remained largely untold (McGrath 1995; Watson 2002, p. 6). This was due to ‘whitewashing of frontier histories’ (Broome 2010, p. 55) which refers to the exclusion of Indigenous people’s experiences and perspectives. In the past, the unjust treatment of Indigenous Australian’s was deliberately suppressed. Massacres often remained unrecorded, making it difficult to verify their extent (Watson 2002, p. 7). Thus, presentations of the past were one-sided. Attempting to address the lack of Indigenous voices in history, a new wave of Australian historiography arose in the 1970’s (Watson 2002, p. 1). It is to this culturally relative historiography that the texts discussed here belong. In Through Their Eyes, editors Lakic and Wrench (1994) have taken an objective approach to historiography by exclusively using primary sources of information to give insight into the attitudes and emotions of the time. They have curated a collection of persuasive letters written to facilitate peace and wellbeing for Indigenous …show more content…

For example, Thomas (cited in Lakic & Wrench 1994, p. 90) writes that he ‘cannot help commiserating’ with the misfortune of the Indigenous people. Repeatedly, he laments the treatment of Indigenous Australian’s, advocating for their protection from malevolent settlers bent on retribution (Lakic & Walker 1994). Similarly, Parker (cited in Lakic & Wrench 1994, p. 86) refers to the European colonist’s actions towards Indigenous people as ‘cruel and unjustifiable’. Parker (cited in Lakic & Wrench 1994, p. 86) admits surprise that Indigenous people do not respond with an equal degree of indiscriminate violence, implying it would been well within their right to do so. While Indigenous people did engage in raids on properties, armed resistance, guerrilla campaigns and acts of sorcery in their attempt to dissuade white occupation, they ‘fought in self-defence, killing only in retaliation’ (Hewitt cited in Medcalf 1995, p. 39). Alternately, European settlers are tarnished by the violent atrocities and numerous massacres the committed against Indigenous people in the name of colonisation. Medcalf (1995) is committed to telling the bloody and forgotten history of Australia and condemns of the inhumane actions of European settlers. He states that the slaughter of many innocent Indigenous people in the Northern Rivers ‘mirrored the brutality that accompanied white

Open Document