"No Sugar"--- Replacement of the In-Class Presentation

1246 Words3 Pages

Jack Davis' No Sugar, first performed in 1985, is a post-colonial realist work written in protest of the 1988 Bicentenary celebrations. In this broadly applicable play, Davis highlights the discrimination against Aborigines between 1929 and 1934 and particularly its justification under the government policy of `protectionism'. Focusing on the experiences of the Millimurra family, No Sugar underscores the view of Aborigines as uncivilized, the attempt to assimilate them to white culture through Aboriginal reserves such as the Moore River Settlement, and the resilience and determination of Aborigines faced with almost complete disempowerment. A fundamental concern of No Sugar is the notion of the definition of power along racial lines. This concern would draw significantly different responses from original and contemporary, Aboriginal and White audiences. Economic, political and social power, but also the less tangible but equally valid linguistic power in the play is invariably held by Whites. That said, Aborigines are, to an extent, empowered by their own language and culture and their resilience in the face of oppression.

Economic power is, in particular, demonstrated through the allocation of resources to Aborigines as `rations'. An element of protectionism, this allocation is more widely representative of the incapacity of Aborigines to overcome social stigma and gain self-sufficiency. Scene two sees the Sergeant respond to Gran's request for soap by suggesting that the Aborigines will `have to work if [they] want luxury items like soap'. In response, Milly highlights the inability for Aborigines to receive fair payment for labor, arguing that in return for Joe's work, he received `a pair of second-hand boots and a piece of...

... middle of paper ...

...ikely to have a negative reaction to political and social domination represented in No Sugar. The need for White and Aboriginal culture to exist together would be recognized by a White audience.

No Sugar also highlights issues of Aboriginal identity, that is, how Aboriginals view themselves and how they are viewed by others. It is suggested that singular view of Aboriginality by Whites is at the core of many forms of racism. Such issues, as with issues of power, draw differing responses from White and Aboriginal audiences in original and contemporary contexts. The play highlights the `authentic' Aboriginality, suggesting that Aborigines are uncivilized, unclean, untrustworthy and highly inferior. For example, the Sergeant suggests that the `Natives best left to keep to themselves', and that he has `nothing against `em, but [he] knows exactly what they're like'.

Open Document