Risperdal Case Summary

928 Words2 Pages

Aaron Banks age 21 has been taking the drug Risperdal since the age 9; even though Risperdal approved for children at the time Aaron was still taking Risperdal. He was still approved to the drug. He grew female breast large enough to be surgically removed. Risperdal is a drug used to treat symptoms of bipolar disorder. Risperdal is also used in autistic children to treat symptoms of irritability. The problem with the Risperdal case is that The Company Johnson and Johnson prescribed a drug that has a health risk. In this case the possible outcomes that may be uncovered are who J&J sold this drug to and what did the FDA do about this situation. Is this drug still on the market to be prescribed to children and adolescents with autism? How many …show more content…

The FDA says that they test there medicines on healthy patients but hundreds of people die from simple mistakes like not watching each person side effect and report the correct information in clinical reports. NO criminal charges were faced to Johnson and Johnson and I think some criminal charges or a settlement for patients who experienced the side effects that the drug Risperdal caused. Each year the FDA take 100,000 people lives from taking medicines that are being approved by the FDA. Who is the FDA truly protecting and what responsibilities does the FDA accept due to the fact that more deaths are led by drugs that are approved by the FDA. The FDA say there for the people but are they really thinking about the lives there taking or the money that their gaining from the drugs they approve each year. The FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring that human and veterinary drug, and vaccines and other biological products and medical devices intended for human use are safe and effective. The FDA should no longer approve medicines that may cause severe side effects or in some cases death; drugs who manufacture these medications should face criminal

Open Document