Richard Strauss And Modernism Essay

1535 Words4 Pages

How did each deal with the past in music?

Taruskin states, “Modernism is not just a condition but a commitment (Taruskin, 1).” This commitment to modernism is what each composer is bringing with them as we are “observing a symbiotic process of highly self-conscious technical innovation and expanded technical resources over the whole course of the nineteenth century (Taruskin, 2).” Richard Strauss, an innovative German Romantic composer and conductor, to many historians can receive such a label as the heir of Richard Wagner. Born into a musical family, father being a principal horn player with the Munich Court Orchestra, his compositional influences find root in Wagner’s opera’s and Liszt’s symphonic poems. Similar to Strauss, the French …show more content…

Stravinsky’s “Right of Spring” is such an example. The harmony in The Rite of Spring is a direct continuation of “Petrouchka.” “Petrouchka” appearing on the musical scene in 1911, and its prevailing musical language ran from an "impressionist haziness to the boisterousness of the post-Wagnerian symphony a la Strauss.” Against this background, "unleashing of the crude, spiky, and the incisive sonorities we find in Petrushka was bound to appear startlingly revolutionary" (Vlad,1978, p.18). One of the most immediately striking features of Petrouchka is the use of the piano; not as a featured soloist but as an integral part of the orchestral sound; which imparts a distinctive flavour to the ensemble (Austin, 1966, p.251). The Russian Dance which features a toccata-like character is dominated by the percussion instruments and the "percussive intonations of the piano" …show more content…

Taruskin elaborates, “Strauss’s music raised eyebrows even higher than the play (Salome), both for the obvious ways in which it intensified the play’s challenge to conventional morality, and for the novelty of its technical procedures (Taruskin, 37).” Embracing nontraditional scales and tonal structures, Claude Debussy comments, in Taruskin, “There is no theory. You merely have to listen. Pleasure is the law (Taruksin, 356).” Was it the nontraditional scales and tonal structures that brought that Debussy was referring? Is there no theory to his nontraditional scales? Or, was Debussy merely focusing on pleasure rather than the theory behind his compositions? Perhaps it was, in his later works, incorporating the elements of the gamelan into his existing style to produce a wholly new kind of sound that he was referring. Maurice Rave, according to Taruskin, “Ravel was not a major essayist… (Taruskin, 86).” But Ravel’s “main thesis is that all great works are shaped by two types of influence – the national and the individual (Taruskin,

Open Document