Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Inequality in the distribution of income
United states wealth inequality
Sociology chpt 1
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Inequality in the distribution of income
"Let them eat cake"
-- Marie-Antoinette
"The poor you will always have with you"
-- Matthew 26:11
There is a difference in wealth between the north/south divide. The
Rich north obtains nearly four fifths of the worlds income whereas the
Poor South has only one fifth. The North is rich and the South is
poverty-stricken. By the word "rich I mean in a material sense - the
north has plenty of material and financial wealth whereas the South
has very little. However, for many people in the south, being
materially wealthy is not something they desire, and they are
therefore spiritually rich. It is impossible for many in the Rich
North to be spiritually rich "oh how hard it is for the rich to enter
the kingdom of God". Although, if they were to share their riches with
the poor (as the bible encourages them to do) then having money, when
used for the benefit of others is a good thing. 'For the love of money
is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have
erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many
sorrows.' Timothy 6:10.
It is possible for world equality to be accomplished. The amount of
money that requires appears a lot but when compared with the amount
spent in HDC's on various things (such as cosmetics and ice cream) it
appears to be a small amount. The following statistics are taken from
the 1999 United Nations Human Development Report. Basic education,
water and sanitation, and basic health and nutrition for every human
on the planet would cost $28 billion. But that is $8 billion less than
is spent on American cosmetics, ice cream in Europe and pet foods
combined.
It is thought by many that having no rich Christians while there is
poverty in the world would be ridiculous. Having a certain number of
rich Christians means that charities are able to operate. These
charities help not only materially poor but spiritually poor to gain a
better standard of life (before and after death.) If the Christians
The heart of the whole notion of wealth lies in the setting of the novel, the east and west eggs of New York City. The west egg was a clustering of the "Nouveau riche" or the newly acquired rich, and the east egg was where the people who inherited their riches resided. The eggs divided the people rich in two with the poor being limited to the middle, the "valley of ashes". Even the way the narrator, Nick Carraway, describes the two communities' gives off a feeling of superiority. Nick describes the east as " the less fashionable of the two, through this is a most superficial tag to express the bizarre and not a little sinister contrast between them" (...
In 1630, the Massachusetts Bay Company set sail to the New World in hope of reforming the Church of England. While crossing the Atlantic, John Winthrop, the puritan leader of the great migration, delivered perhaps the most famous sermon aboard the Arbella, entitled “A Model of Christian Charity.” Winthrop’s sermon gave hope to puritan immigrants to reform the Church of England and set an example for future immigrants. The Puritan’s was a goal to get rid of the offensive features that Catholicism left behind when the Protestant Reformation took place. Under Puritanism, there was a constant strain to devote your life to God and your neighbors. Unlike the old England, they wanted to prove that New England was a community of love and individual worship to God. Therefore, they created a covenant with God and would live their lives according to the covenant. Because of the covenant, Puritans tried to abide by God’s law and got rid of anything that opposed their way of life. Between 1630 and the 18th century, the Puritans tried to create a new society in New England by creating a covenant with God and living your life according to God’s rule, but in the end failed to reform the Church of England. By the mid 1630’s, threats to the Puritans such as Roger Williams, Anne Hutchinson, and Thomas Hooker were being banned from the Puritan community for their divergent beliefs. 20 years later, another problem arose with the children of church members and if they were to be granted full membership to the church. Because of these children, a Halfway Covenant was developed to make them “halfway” church members. And even more of a threat to the Puritan society was their notion that they were failing God, because of the belief that witches existed in 1692.
Andrew Carnegie believes in a system based on principles and responsibility. The system is Individualism and when everyone strives towards the same goals the system is fair and prosperous. Carnegie’s essay is his attempt to show people a way to reach an accommodation between individualism and fairness. This system can only work if everyone knows and participates in his or her responsibilities. I will discuss Carnegie’s thesis, his arguments and the possible results of his goals.
nothing, I feel that the world is alright the way that it is and that
Many have tried to use money on several occasions to help or solve a situation, however this has been noted to be not very effective. Often times, people assume that by giving heaping amounts of money to an issue, they will solve it. This is not the case. However, there is an issue with this.
In the documents titled, William Graham Sumner on Social Darwinism and Andrew Carnegie Explains the Gospel of Wealth, Sumner and Carnegie both analyze their perspective on the idea on “social darwinism.” To begin with, both documents argue differently about wealth, poverty and their consequences. Sumner is a supporter of social darwinism. In the aspects of wealth and poverty he believes that the wealthy are those with more capital and rewards from nature, while the poor are “those who have inherited disease and depraved appetites, or have been brought up in vice and ignorance, or have themselves yielded to vice, extravagance, idleness, and imprudence” (Sumner, 36). The consequences of Sumner’s views on wealth and poverty is that they both contribute to the idea of inequality and how it is not likely for the poor to be of equal status with the wealthy. Furthermore, Carnegie views wealth and poverty as a reciprocative relation. He does not necessarily state that the wealthy and poor are equal, but he believes that the wealthy are the ones who “should use their wisdom, experiences, and wealth as stewards for the poor” (textbook, 489). Ultimately, the consequences of
No matter the walk you take in life at the end of the day are you rich with love, respect and honor. Or, are you poverty stricken simply because you choose not to allow love, respect and honor to shine through. Not only on yourself but, also on those around you. In life a hard lesson needs to be learned and we can only learn this for ourselves, be rich because of who you are and not what you have because in the end people will not remember the house you had, the material possessions you bought or gifts that you gave, what they will remember is if you held your head high, even through the rough times, the respect you gave and most importantly, the love you
The Bible does not say that money is bad. However, what it does say is
it hard for the countries in the South to even try and get out of
The stronger will do anything in their power to make a profit, leaving the weak with nothing. Kuyper says, “…the more powerful exploited the weaker by means of a weapon against which there was no defense” (Kuyper, Abraham, and James W. Skillen 26). Additionally, he states that “…the idolization of money killed the nobility in the human heart” (Kuyper, Abraham, and James W. Skillen 31). Kuyper talks about how Jesus felt bad for the rich and sided with the poor (Kuyper, Abraham, and James W. Skillen 32). Matthew 6:19-21 says, “Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.” Earthly materials mean nothing because the real treasure awaits in
Therefore, many people misread self-interest is useless, and meaningless. However, they are wrong somehow, and actually there are some benefits of being self-interest.
"The purpose of developing a Christian view of the world is not merely to evaluate and judge the world, but to change it," (Boa, 2004). Having a Christian worldview is hard enough in American but add in the entire world and it can be a little trickier. Thinking Christianly has a major impact on how someone would do business overseas, in a global economy. When it comes to a Christian worldview in a global economy there are numerous issues that can come up. Different countries and cultures have different things that they deem acceptable; however, when you are looking at it from a Christian standpoint you may have to handle things in a different manner. Just because something is acceptable or legal in the world does not make it acceptable to someone with a Christian worldview. John 17:17 says that, "The word is truth," so when one is looking for direction and guidance in any aspect of business he will always know that the word of God is truth that he can turn to. Although the field of business has many negative connotations with Christianity there are also positive ones. There are two main issues that this paper will address. The first issue, pollution, can be view negatively. The second issue, job opportunities, can be view positively.
brought to an end in a variety of places. This would mean a lot of
The same applies to ‘beneficial’ which could be interpreted to mean; pleasant, healthy, productive, useful, life-enhancing. How to define good in a moral sense has puzzled philosophers for thousands of years, but there has been two main approaches; a teleological and deontological approach. The teleological approach states that the moral action is the one that aims to fulfil the purpose of the agent. However, the teleological approach can assess how moral an action is on how well it achieves particular ends. Whereas the deontological approach believes that true morality is derived from a set of duties which exist in their own
Christianity and Wealth 'Jesus said to the rich young man, "Go, sell all that you have and