Rhetorical Analysis On 'Always' By Barack Obama

742 Words2 Pages

Barack Obama “Always” 2012. Obama’s overall message to society throughout this ad was the promotion of “education, training, research and technology” in order to better America as a nation. In the beginning of the ad Obama hinted at some of the other candidates ridiculing him of his previous term and trying to drag his name through the mud however, not once did he bring them up flash pictures of them or drop their names to influence society to vote for him. Obama remained professional and stressed the importance of the initiatives he wanted to set forward in order to make America prosper as a leading country. After checking the evidence and evaluating this ad on “factcheck.org” I found nothing due to the original ad airing back in 2012 however, …show more content…

The two separate ads exemplify exactly what a candidate could say in an campaign ad and what they shouldn’t say. For an example, swaying away from the 2012 election and going into the in the 2017 presidential election Hillary resorts to using Trumps words against him to show America who he really is as if they hadn’t already knew. In “Who Are We”, Clinton showed slides of Trump using profane language and belittling a disabled man. The ad gave a clear understanding of the candidates’ main focus and the initial reason for running for president. Although it was just like any other political campaign ad in regards to selling herself and her brand, there were still a lot of differences between her and her republican opponent, Donald Trump. Personally I feel it was not a hard at all when it came to distinguishing the two from one another. Hilary Clinton’s ad had more of a compare and contrast, “you decide for yourself” type of an approach. She did once bash her opponent but rather compare from statements her opponent has made to actions made by her. Now of course with any political campaign ad, there will be bias coming from

Open Document