Rhetorical Analysis Of We Could Deliver It Better If The Berlin Wall

504 Words2 Pages

Subtopic 3:

Reagan's speech, emphasized freedom and reunification; He deliberately asked for more than Gorbachev would extend, which he saw as an effort to weaken Europe's perception of the Russian peace leader. Russian press called Reagan`s speech as an “openly provocative and warmongering speech"
Sub topic 4:
In May 15, 1967, Reagan give forceful, public call to knock down the Berlin Wall, but this was one of many such proclamations during that first quest for the presidency. On May 21, 1968, in Florida, and again the next month in Wyoming, Reagan stated that instead of America unilaterally giving wheat to the Soviets, the Soviets should make a major concession: America should tell the Soviets, “We could deliver it better if the Berlin Wall wasn’t there!” …show more content…

At home, the State Department fretted that Reagan’s harsh rhetoric would bollix efforts to negotiate with Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev. The West German government worried such a challenge to the status quo could spark a nuclear confrontation with Russia. But in Moscow, the target of Reagan’s fiery rhetoric, Gorbachev was unperturbed, and his top aides made clear to their American counterparts that they were fine with Reagan’s demand. Standard Cold War stuff, they said. Bring it on.
Sub topic 6:
At that time, the speech was barely seen as the beginning of any ending. On the contrary, what is now often referred to as perhaps Reagan's most powerful discourse was almost completely ignored.
The speech did not make much of a stir, the newspapers preferred to focus on other events. The network news hardly noticed. The main German news magazine, Der Spiegel, did not report on the speech until six months later, when it called Reagan's speech "the work of the fans"
Sub topic

Open Document