Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Patrick Henry's speech
Analyzing Patrick Henry's speech
Analysis of Patrick Henry's speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Often the first battles for change are with ink and spoken word. Rhetoric in language is key to making the word impact others in such a way it creates a movement. These movements serve the desires of those who initially write them out. Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention” is meant to convince the colonists that war is the only way to for them to be free from Britain and to rally the colonists together as one nation against the British in the coming conflict. The primary purpose of Patrick Henry’s address is to bring to light the need to go to war with Britain in order to attain their rights. He does this by first acknowledging that the colonist’s allegiance to Britain is a problem. He tells the assembly they “listen to the song of a …show more content…
Henry illustrates how Britain is retaining the loyalty of the colonies despite that Britain will ultimately be their downfall. This allusion makes an appeal to the logic of the audience against Britain and their attempt to “[fool] with a kiss.” This allusion is to the betrayal of Jesus by Judas, a disciple of Jesus who identifies him to the Romans by kissing him. The kiss represents an act that may initially seem beneficial, but is secretly harmful to the recipient. These two allusions play into the doubt and uncertainty the colonists have about the true intentions of Britain. Henry confirms these doubts for the audience when he asks “what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission?” This rhetorical question plays back on the audience's growing doubts, causing them to draw the conclusion that if Britain is really their ally, there would be no need for the number of ships and soldiers they are sending to the
Many speeches have shaped the nation we live in today. Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention” and Benjamin Franklin’s “Speech in the Convention” are two of the most prominent speeches that have assisted in the forging of our new nation. The “Speech in the Virginia Convention” serves to encourage those that listened to take arms against the British and fight the injustice being done to them. The “Speech in the Convention” admits to the imperfections of the Constitution but supports its ultimate purpose. Both Patrick Henry and Benjamin Franklin believe leaders must do away with compromise and lead when it’s best for the people as a whole. However, Patrick discourages any future compromise, while Benjamin Franklin feels that future
Patrick Henry's "Speech in the Virginia Convention" was a powerful argument for American Independence. This was an example of an oratory approach. Henry used political views to help in his persuasion. Unlike Jonathan Edwards, Henry did not use the approach of scare tactics, but rather the approach to reason and logic. Both of the renowned speakers used strong feelings in their persuasive speeches. They also used Biblical illusions to strengthen their points. The two speakers both had to gain the attention of the audience. The speakers also gained their attention through the fact that they held high social and political level positions.
There are few speeches in the American history that compel us towards great acts of patriotism. Patrick Henry's speech in the Virginia Provincial Convention of 1775 is a prime example of one of these great speeches. During the debates on whether or not to compromise with Great Britain, Patrick Henry proposed the idea to his fellow members of the First Continental Congress to declare war on Great Britain. A reason why the speech was so powerful was the rhetorical strategies of the diction of slavery, the appeal to God, and the appeal to logic, that he deftly employed.
He addressed the cruel taxes and policies that have been placed upon the American people. He also, speaks of the tiring efforts of the colonies to overcome the impossible British policies. Henry begins his statement with the numerous actions taken by people in response to the British approach to limit their freedom. Writing in the statement, Henry complains that many actions have been taken in an effort to achieve freedom but have failed. Henry himself writes, “In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation?”. In making this comment Henry urges the British to be prepared for them. After overcoming the stamp act , Henry urges the British to be ready for revolution if freedom is not given. This exactly, Henry points out, if basic privileges are not given to men and women, there will be a war. Henry himself writes. “give me liberty, or give me death!”. Basically, Henry is warning that if freedom is not given, he is willing to fight until it is. Patrick Henry’s statement is crucial to the American cause in the War for Independence. He led the fight against the stamp act, after being elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1765. Also, he proposed his argument for going to war was in an effort to live as free men and fight. His speech inspired men to join the cause and fight for
Wilson, T. W. (n.d.). "This is War" American Rhetoric: The Power of Oratory in the United States. Retrieved April 14, 2011, from http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/wilsonwarmessage.htm
Ann Richards’s keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention in 1988 was extremely interesting to watch. I believe her speech was intended to be focused on the American family and also the American farmers. These two areas seemed to be very important to Mrs. Richards and she made a point to discuss both.
Looking back in American history, it is needless to say that there were many trials and tribulations that were overcome to achieve the freedom U.S citizens have today. In retrospect, it is astonishing how the colonists were oppressed by the British for more than a century and finally joined together with courage to revolt against them. This type of revolution would not have been alive if it were not for the art of rhetoric. Political icons in American history used rhetoric to stoke the wrath of colonists to revolt against the British. Founding Father, Benjamin Franklin, significantly used visual rhetoric to persuade the colonies to unite together with his first political cartoon entitled, “Join, or Die,” which was published in the Pennsylvania Gazette in 1754. Benjamin Franklin used his credibility to establish a well-crafted rhetorical illustration, in which its symbolization, initials, and caption all play an active role in the ground breaking drawing, which changed the minds of colonists towards the pursuit of freedom that is exercised today.
The eighteenth century, a time of turmoil and chaos in the colonies, brought many opinionated writers to the forefront in support or refutation of the coming American Revolution. This highly controversial war that would ultimately separate the future United States of America from Great Britain became the center of debate. Two writers, both of whom supported the Revolution, now stand to fully illuminate one side of the debate. Thomas Paine, a radical propagandist, wrote many pieces during this time including “The Crisis Number 1” (1776). Through writing, he appealed to the “common man” in order to convince them to gather their arms and fight for their freedom. In this document, he utilizes many of the same rhetorical skills and propaganda techniques as Patrick Henry, a convincing orator, did in his famous speech delivered to the state’s delegates in 1775. Among these techniques are transfer, abstract language, and pathos. In both works, these were used to call the audiences to war. These influential pieces both contained a call to action which, through the use of strong and decisive language, aided the beginning of the American Revolution.
The Colonists are tired of the mistreatment and they are effectively severing all “Allegiance to the British Crown, and. . . political connection” (para. 23). The audience of The Declaration of Independence, the world, is specifically addressed twice. His opening paragraph introduces the context for the Declaration.
Thomas Jefferson, in his inaugural address, stated that America was, “A rising nation, spread over a wide and fruitful land, traversing all the seas with the rich productions of their industry…advancing rapidly to the destinies beyond the reach of mortal eye...” He was a strong believer in the progressive nature of morality and held an optimistic view of the nature of humanity and human ability. Jefferson believed that all people were equally naturally endowed with the ability to determine right and wrong. This strong belief in even the common man’s ability to make judgements, gave him a foundation for his support of democracy. Jefferson believed that since all men had this judgement naturally gifted to them, they were capable of selecting
In the “Speech at the Virginia Convention” Patrick Henry tries to persuade colonists to fight a war against the English; he uses several main rhetorical strategies such as; parallelism, metaphor, and rhetorical questions.
Thursday afternoon, November 19, 1863, sixteenth president of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, delivered his Gettysburg Address, during the American Civil War, in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania; in order to sanctify Gettysburg National Cemetery. Lincoln’s purpose was to inform the listeners of the single-mindedness of the soldier's sacrifice: equality, freedom, and national unity. He adopts a restorative, yet mournful tone in order to encourage his spectators that a new beginning has derived, and to honor the soldiers’ sacrifices by continuing to fight for the morals for which they made the sacrifice.
Abraham Lincoln was President of the United States during the American Civil War that began in 1861.
Henry uses logos to appeal the colonists. An example of this is, “Has Britain any enemy in this quarter of the world, to call for this accumulation of navies and armies… it is meant for us.” This appeals to the colonists because it logical, why else would Britain have their military over here? Henry make it seem like there is only one logical answer. Henry uses rhetorical
Patrick Henry’s introduction explained his use of Biblical language. He never used direct quotations from the Bible but he used themes found in Scripture to achieve his purpose. In the opening paragraph, the assembly is reminded of their responsibilities which included placing duty to God first and duty to country second. This honored the first of the Ten Commandments given in Exodus 20:3 in which God commanded that we must not have any other god but Him. Mr. Henry also expressed in the introduction, his belief that keeping silent on the matter at hand would make him guilty...