Rhetorical Analysis Of Reagan's Speech

866 Words2 Pages

On January 28th, 1986, the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded upon takeoff murdering seven astronauts in it. The NASA space shuttle Challenger exploded on January 28, 1986, only 75 seconds after liftoff, conveying an overwhelming end to the spacecraft's tenth mission. The disaster killed each of the seven astronauts aboard, including Christa McAuliffe, a teacher from New Hampshire who would have been the main non military personnel in space (Howell). It was later confirmed that two elastic O-rings, which had been designed to isolate the sections of the rocket booster, had flopped because of cold temperatures on the morning of the launch. The catastrophe and its aftermath got broad media coverage and prompted NASA to temporarily suspend all shuttle …show more content…

To additionally deal with our emotions, Reagan again calls us to national mourning, and sets up the essential audience as the collective mourners. Reagan narrows his focus to the first and most influenced sub-audience: the families of the fallen. He acknowledges the inappropriateness of recommending how they should feel and offers adulate they can grab hold with words like brave, brave, uncommon grace, and unique soul (Wall). Reagan's most viable component about his speech was by a long shot his capacity to be straightforward with his audience, yet sympathetic in the meantime. Above all else, the reality alone that Reagan wiped out his State of the Union speech to make sure he could convey this speech and improve the American people feel gives his speech the edge it needs before he even conveys it. He at that point demonstrates pathos by consoling the general population in the midst of disaster; however he also connects to his audience in order to show them he should have been one of them as he heard the news of the Challenger exploding (Howell). He begins off the whole address by discussing how he and his better half are "tormented to the core" by the disaster. He says, "We know we share this torment with the greater part of the people of our country (Cannon). This is really a national …show more content…

By utilizing the words "torment" and "offer" he associates himself and his significant other with everyone else in the nation, both youngsters and grown-ups that saw the disaster. In any case, at that point, by saying it is a national loss he again points out that as a whole (with him at the top) it has influenced numerous people (Cannon). He also talks specifically to the youngsters in the nation that viewed the disaster live. He conveys this part with an alternate tone that tells the children this message is extraordinary and only for them so that they might be consoled. Overall, he makes the speech profoundly personal, yet not exploitive, in order to better relate to his audience so that he may consol them. Finally, Reagan's strong demeanor while introducing his speech was the completing touch he expected to genuinely connect with the people. He took the catastrophe into his own hands right when it happened on the grounds that he knew that it was his obligation to state something in order to quiet the country. Simply taking and remaining solitary, shows that he was exceptionally strong. The principle point of his back rub was to offer condolences to those influenced by the accident, advise us this is simply part of the process of exploration, and to advocate future space

Open Document